A Life Clustering Framework for Prognostics of Gas Turbine Engines under Limited Data Situations

Document Type : Original Article


1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 ECE Faculty, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran


The reliability of data driven prognostics algorithms severely depends on the volume of data. Therefore in case of limited data availability, life estimations usually are not acceptable; because the quantity of run to failure data is not sufficient to train prognostics model efficiently. To board this problem, a life clustering prognostics (LCP) framework is proposed. LCP regenerates the train data at different ages and outcomes to increment of the training data volume. So, the method is useful for limited data conditions. In this research, initially LCP performance is studied in normal situation is; successively robustness of the framework under limited data conditions is considered. For this purpose, a case study on turbofan engines is performed. The accuracy for the proposed LCP approach is 71% and better than other approaches. The prognostics accuracy is compared in various situations of data deficiency for the case study. The prognostic measures remain almost unchanged when the training data is even one third. Successively, prognostics accuracy decreases with a slight slope; so that when the training data drops from 100 to 5%, the accuracy of the results drops 26%. The results indicates the robustness of the proposed algorithm in limited data situation. The main contribution of this paper include: (1) The effectiveness of life clustering idea for use in prognostics algorithms is proven; (2) A step-by-step framework for LCP is provided; (3) A robustness analysis is performed for the proposed prognostics algorithm.


  1. Khezri R, Hosseini R, Mazinani M. “A fuzzy rule- based expert system for the prognosis of the risk of development of the breast cancer.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics. Vol 27, No 10, (2014), 1557-1564. doi: 10.5829/idosi.ije.2014.27.10a.09
  2. Hu C, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Si X. “A survey on life prediction of equipment.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. Vol 28, No 1, (2015), 25-33. doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2014.12.020
  3. Hamidi H, Daraee A. “Analysis of pre-processing and post-processing methods and using data mining to diagnose heart diseases.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics . Vol 29, No 7, (2016), 921-930. doi: 10.5829/idosi.ije.2016.29.07a.06
  4. Amini M, Moharrami A, Poursaeidi E. “Failure probability and remaining life assessment of reheater tubes.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications. Vol 26, No 5, (2013), 543-552. doi: 10.5829/idosi.ije.2013.26.05b.11
  5. Peng Y, Dong M, Zuo MJ. “Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: a review.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Vol 50, (2010), 297-313. doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2482-0
  6. Mao R, Zhu H, Zhang L, Chen A. “A new method to assist small data set neural network learning. InIntelligent Systems Design and Applications.” IEEE ISDA'06.  Vol 1, (2006), 17-22. DOI:10.1109/ISDA.2006.67
  7. Ranasinghe GD, Lindgren T, Girolami M, Parlikad AK. “A Methodology for Prognostics Under the Conditions of Limited Failure Data Availability”. IEEE Access. Vol 17, (2019), 173-179. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2960310
  8. Li YG, Nilkitsaranont P. “Gas turbine performance prognostic for condition-based maintenance.” Applied Energy. Vol 86, No 10, (2009), 2152-2161. doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.02.011
  9. Xiongzi CH, Jinsong YU, Diyin TA, Yingxun WA. “A novel pf-lssvr-based framework for failure prognostics of nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. Vol 25, (2012), 715-724. doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60438-X
  10. Tongyang LI, Shaoping WA, Jian SH, Zhonghai MA. “An adaptive-order particle filter for remaining useful life prediction of aviation piston pumps.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics.Vol 31, (2018), 941-948. doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2017.09.002
  11.  Diallo ON. “A data analytics approach to gas turbine prognostics and health management” (Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology).
  12. Caesarendra W, Widodo A, Yang BS. “Combination of probability approach and support vector machine towards machine health prognostics.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. Vol 26, (2011), 165-173. doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.09.008
  13. Huang HZ, Wang HK, Li YF, Zhang L, Liu Z. “Support vector machine based estimation of remaining useful life: current research status and future trends.” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. Vol 29, (2015), 151-163. doi.org/10.1007/s12206-014-1222-z
  14. Simon D. “A comparison of filtering approaches for aircraft engine health estimation.” Aerospace Science and Technology.Vol 12, (2008), 276-284. doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2007.06.002
  15. Lu F, Ju H, Huang J. “An improved extended Kalman filter with inequality constraints for gas turbine engine health monitoring.” Aerospace Science and Technology. Vol 30, (2016), 36-47. doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.08.008
  16. Ding C, Xu J, Xu L. “ISHM-based intelligent fusion prognostics for space avionics.” Aerospace Science and Technology. Vol 29, (2013), 200-205. doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2013.01.013
  17. Goebel K, Saha B, Saxena A. “A comparison of three data-driven techniques for prognostics.” In 62nd Meeting of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology (Mfpt), (2008), 119-131.
  18. Xu J, Wang Y, Xu L. “PHM-oriented integrated fusion prognostics for aircraft engines based on sensor data.” IEEE Sensors Journal. Vol 14, (2014), 1124-1132. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2013.2293517
  19. Moghaddass R, Zuo MJ. “An integrated framework for online diagnostic and prognostic health monitoring using a multistate deterioration process.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety. Vol 124, (2014), 92-104. doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.006
  20. Xiang Y, Liu Y. “Application of inverse first-order reliability method for probabilistic fatigue life prediction.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. Vol 26, (2011), 148-156. doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.11.001
  21. Javed K. “A robust & reliable Data-driven prognostics approach based on extreme learning machine and fuzzy clustering” (Doctoral Dissertation).
  22. Saxena A, Goebel K, Simon D, Eklund N. “Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation.” IEEE InPrognostics and Health Management, (2008). 1-9. DOI:10.1109/PHM.2008.4711414
  23. Ramasso E, Rombaut M, Zerhouni N. “Joint prediction of observations and states in time-series: a partially supervised prognostics approach based on belief functions and knn. Networks”. (2013). DOI: ff10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2198882
  24. Ramasso E. “Investigating computational geometry for failure prognostics.” International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management. Vol 5, (2014).
  25. Khelif R, Malinowski S, Chebel-Morello B, Zerhouni N. “RUL prediction based on a new similarity-instance based approach.” IEEE InIndustrial Electronics (ISIE), (2014), 2463-2468. DOI: 10.1109/ISIE.2014.6865006
  26. Yakout M, Elkhatib A, Nassef MG. “Rolling element bearings absolute life prediction using modal analysis.” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. Vol 32, (2018), 91-99. doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-1210-1
  27. Prasad SR, Sekhar AS. “Life estimation of shafts using vibration based fatigue analysis.” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. Vol 32, (2018), 4071-4078. DOI: 10.1007/s12206-018-0806-4
  28. Mohammadi E, Montazeri-Gh M. “Simulation of full and part-load performance deterioration of industrial two-shaft gas turbine.” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power.Vol 136, (2014), 26-35. DOI: 10.1115/1.4027187
  29. Dabaghi E, Kashanian H. “Feature dimension reduction of multisensor data fusion using principal component fuzzy analysis.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics, Vol 30, No. 4, (2017), 493-499. doi: 10.5829/idosi.ije.2017.30.04a.06
  30. Mahmoodian A., Durali M., Abbasain T., Saadat M., “Optimized Age Dependent Clustering Algorithm for Prognosis: A Case Study on Gas Turbines”, Scientiairanica Transaction B: Mechanical Engineering, (2020), (Articles in Press, Available Online) DOI:10.24200/SCI.2020.53863.3459
  31. An D, Kim NH, Choi JH. “Statistical aspects in neural network for the purpose of prognostics.” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. Vol 29, (2015), 1369-1375. DOI: 10.1007/s12206-015-0306-8
  32. Wang T, Yu J, Siegel D, Lee J. “A similarity-based prognostics approach for remaining useful life estimation of engineered systems.” IEEE InPrognostics and Health Management, (2008). 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/PHM.2008.4711421
  33. Javed K, Gouriveau R, Zerhouni N., “Novel failure prognostics approach with dynamic thresholds for machine degradation.” IEEE InIndustrial Electronics Society IECON 2013-39th Annual Conference of the IEEE, (2013) 4404-4409. DOI: 10.1109/IECON.2013.6699844