Three Different Methods for Approximate Analysis of Bar Structures

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Toos Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran


In this paper, modified solutions were compared through utilizing three different approximate methods for bar structures. The modifications considered various changes in the initial design. To authors' best of knowledge, the studies have carried out on this matter so far are not broad enough and have considerred the simeltaneous variations of size, geometry and topology on the bar structures. In this study, three well-known methods, including combined approximation, rational approximation and the approximate inversion of stiffness matrix methods are formulated. A large variety of problems will be performed with different characteristics to compare the ability of these approaches in determining the suitable approximate modified displacements. Cross sectional properties and nodal coordinates are considered as design variables. Displacement errors and computational efforts of the processes considered as comparison factors. It is shown that the approximate inversion of the stiffness matrix method cannot solve the problems, which requires the modification of structural geometry. Furthermore, the combined approximation and rational approximation methods have the ability of reaching displacements with suitable quality in the problems with a moderate size.


1. Kirsch, U., "A unified reanalysis approach for structural analysis,
design, and optimization", Structural and Multidisciplinary
Optimization,  Vol. 25, No. 2, (2003), 67-85. 
2. Kirsch, U. and Hofman, B., "Approximate behavior models for
optimum structural design", (1981), Technion-Israel Inst Of Tech
Haifa Dept Of Civil Engineering. 
3. Kirsch, U., "Reduced basis approximations of structural
displacements for optimaldesign", AIAA Journal,  Vol. 29, No.
10, (1991), 1751-1758. 
4. Wu, B., Li, Z. and Li, S., "The implementation of a vector-valued
rational approximate method in structural reanalysis problems",
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 
Vol. 192, No. 13-14, (2003), 1773-1784. 
5. Sidi, A., "Rational approximations from power series of vectorvalued
meromorphic functions" (1992), Computer Science
Department, Technion. 
6. Impollonia, N., "A method to derive approximate explicit
solutions for structural mechanics problems", International
Journal of Solids and Structures,  Vol. 43, No. 22-23, (2006),
7. Fuchs, M.B., "Unimodal beam elements", International Journal
of Solids and Structures,  Vol. 27, No. 5, (1991), 533-545. 
8. Fuchs, M., "Unimodal formulation of the analysis and design
problems for framed structures", Computers & Structures,  Vol.
63, No. 4, (1997), 739-747. 
9. Fuchs, M.B., "Analytic representation of member forces in linear
elastic redundant trusses", International Journal of Solids and
Structures,  Vol. 29, No. 4, (1992), 519-530. 
10. Wang, H., Li, E. and Li, G., "A parallel reanalysis method based
on approximate inverse matrix for complex engineering
problems", Journal of Mechanical Design,  Vol. 135, No. 8,
(2013), 081001. 
11. Gao, G., Wang, H., Li, E. and Li, G., "An exact block-based
reanalysis method for local modifications", Computers &
Structures,  Vol. 158, (2015), 369-380. 
12. Wang, H., Fan, T. and Li, G., "Reanalysis-based space mapping
method, an alternative optimization way for expensive
simulation-based problems", Structural and Multidisciplinary
Optimization,  Vol. 55, No. 6, (2017), 2143-2157. 
13. Kim, Y.-S. and Eun, H.-C., "Reanalysis of modified structures by
adding or removing substructures", Advances in Civil
Engineering,  Vol. 2018, (2018), Article ID 3084078. 
14. Hosseinzadeh, Y., Taghizadieh, N. and Jalili, S., "A new
structural reanalysis approach based on the polynomial-type
extrapolation methods", Structural and Multidisciplinary
Optimization,  Vol. 58, No. 3, (2018), 1033-1049. 
15. Koohestani, K., "Structural reanalysis via force method",
International Journal of Solids and Structures,  Vol. 136, No.,
(2018), 103-111. 
16. Senne, T.A., Gomes, F.A. and Santos, S.A., "On the approximate
reanalysis technique in topology optimization", Optimization and
Engineering,  Vol. 20, No. 1, (2019), 251-275. 
17. Kirsch, U., "Combined approximations–a general reanalysis
approach for structural optimization", Structural and
Multidisciplinary Optimization,  Vol. 20, No. 2, (2000), 97-106. 
18. Akgün, M.A., Garcelon, J.H. and Haftka, R.T., "Fast exact linear
and nonā€linear structural reanalysis and the sherman–morrison–
woodbury formulas", International Journal for Numerical
Methods in Engineering,  Vol. 50, No. 7, (2001), 1587-1606. 
19. Hager, W.W., "Updating the inverse of a matrix", SIAM Review, 
Vol. 31, No. 2, (1989), 221-239.