Study on the Contrast between Two Seismic Response Analysis Programs of Soil Layer


School of Architecture Engineering, Binzhou University, Binzhou, China


56 ground motions of the bedrock and surface are selected from 28 stiff sites ( site class I and site classⅡ) of the KiK-net station.The peak acceleration, response spectra and shear strain of actual hard sites are calculated by using SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1. The similarities and differences between SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 and their differences from measured records are analyzed. It provides a basis for improving the seismic response analysis method of soil layers. The results show that when the soil is not obviously nonlinear, most of the difference in PGA results calculated by SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 can be ignored, and the maximum error of the calculated soil shear strain is also less than 20%. When the soil is highly nonlinear, only a few differences in PGA results can be ignored. The maximum error of shear strain of the soil is greater than 20%. The results of peak acceleration and response spectra calculated by SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 differ greatly from the measured results in most cases. Nevertheless, the probability of having big difference and significant difference between LSSRLI-1 and measured response spectra is greater than SHAKE2000.


1.     Chen, Z.S., Meng, S.J., Li, Y.R. and Chen, L.W., "A study on the analysis method of soil layer seismic response in seasonal frozen site", in Applied Mechanics and Materials, Trans Tech Publ. Vol. 238, (2012), 872-875.
2.     Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S., "A wavelet-based procedure for mining of pulse-like ground motions features in response spectra", International Journal of Engineering, Transaction A: Basics Vol. 25, No. 1, (2012), 39-50.
3.     Zhou, C.X., Zheng, S.P. and Ye, Y.Q., "Influence of silt soil layer on the space seismic design response spectrum", in Applied Mechanics and Materials, Trans Tech Publ. Vol. 624, (2014), 622-625.
4.     Di Giulio, G., Improta, L., Calderoni, G. and Rovelli, A., "A study of the seismic response of the city of benevento (southern italy) through a combined analysis of seismological and geological data", Engineering Geology,  Vol. 97, No. 3-4, (2008), 146-170.
5.     Mohanty, S. and Patra, N.R., Assessment of liquefaction potential of pond ash at panipat in india using shake2000, in Geocongress 2012: State of the art and practice in geotechnical engineering. 2012.1829-1838.
6.     Ordonez, G.A., "Shake2000: A computer program for the 1d analysis of geotechnical earthquake engineering problems", Geomotions, LLC, USA,  (2000).
7.     Martirosyan, A., Biswas, N., Dutta, U., Cole, D. and Papageorgiou, A., "Ground motion analysis in the anchorage basin: 1-d approach", Journal of Earthquake Engineering,  Vol. 7, No. 2, (2003), 251-274.
8.     Ardeshir, A., Ahmadi, P.F. and Bayat, H., "A prioritization model for hse risk assessment using combined failure mode and effect analysis and fuzzy inference system: A case study in iranian construction industry", International Journal of Engineering,  Vol. 31, No. 9, (2018), 1487-1497.
9.     Liao, Z., Seismic microzonation. 1989, Seismic Press Beijing.
10.   China, N.S.o.t.P.s.R.o., Code for seismic safety evaluation of engineering sites, in Beijing: Chinese Standard Press. 2005.
11.   Liao, Z.P., "Introduction to wave motion theories in engineering", Science, Beijing,  (2002).
12.   Lin, W., Wang, H. and Zhang, Y., "Comparison of two computational microstructure models for predicting effective transverse elastic properties of unidirectional fiber reinforced composites", International Journal of Engineering, Transaction C:Aspects,  Vol. 31, No. 9, (2018), 1498-1504.
13.   Wenhao, Q., Jingshan, B. and Dedong, L., "A test for three programs of soil layer seismic response analysis by strong earthquake record", Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration-Chinese Edition-,  Vol. 25, No. 5, (2005), 30.
14.   Kwok, A.O., Stewart, J.P. and Hashash, Y.M., "Nonlinear ground-response analysis of turkey flat shallow stiff-soil site to strong ground motion", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,  Vol. 98,No. 1, (2008), 331-343.
15.   GB50011, C.S., "Code for seismic design of buildings", China Building Industry Press, Beijing,  (2010).
16.   Moussa, A. and Salah, M., "Formulation of an explicit numerical approach for a large number of cycles", International Journal of Engineering, Transaction C: Aspects  Vol. 31, No. 9, (2018), 684-693.
17.   Karimaee-Tabarestani, M. and Zarrati, A., "Effect of collar on time development and extent of scour hole around cylindrical bridge piers", International Journal of Engineering-Transactions C: Aspects,  Vol. 25, No. 1, (2011), 11-16.
18.   Tavakoli, H. and Kiakojouri, F., "Numerical study of progressive collapse in framed structures: A new approach for dynamic column removal", International Journal of Engineering, Transaction A: Basics, Vol. 26, No. 7 (2013), 685-692.
19.   Ye, G.B. and Guo, Y.F., "Test analysis on shear strength increment of soft soil under embankment fill", Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,  Vol. 15, (2010), 1-9.
20.   Sun, R., Chen, H.-j. and Yuan, X.-m., "Uncertainty of non-linear dynamic shear modular ratio and dampingratio of soils", Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,  Vol. 8, (2010), 017.
21.   China, N.S.o.t.P.s.R.o., Chinese seismic intensity scale. 2008: Beijing: Chinese Standard Press,.