Improvement of Efficiency of Coal-Fired Steam Power Plant by Reducing Heat Rejection Temperature at Condenser Using Kalina Cycle


Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Durgapur, West Bengal, India


This paper proposes an approach for improving the plant efficiency by reducing the heat rejection temperature of power cycle using Kalina Cycle System 11 (KCS11) which is integrated at the steam condenser of a 500 MWe SubC (subcritical) coal-fired power plant. It is modelled by using power plant simulation software ‘Cycle Tempo’ at different plant operating conditions. Results show that the additional net electric power of 5.14 MWe from KCS11 improves the  net energy and exergy efficiencies of the power plant by about 0.302 % point and 0.27 % point, respectively at full load over the stand-alone coal-fired steam power plant. Thereby, the carbon dioxide (CO2) emission is reduced by about 2.02 t/h at full load. Combined plant efficiencies decrease with decrease in evaporator outlet temperature due to decrease in vapour quality of binary mixture at turbine inlet and higher steam turbine back pressure. Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCoE) generation and payback period of the combined cycle power plant are about Rs 1.734 and 4.237 years, respectively and the cost of fuel saving is about Rs 0.685 per kg of coal which is lower than the fuel cost.


1.     He, J., Liu, C., Xu, X., Li, Y., Wu, S. and Xu, J., “Performance research on modified KCS (Kalina cycle system) 11 without throttle valve”, Energy, Vol. 64, (2014), 389–397.
2.     Matsuda, K., “Low heat power generation system”, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 70, No. 2, (2014), 1056–1061.
3.     Vidhi, R., Kuravi, S., Goswami, D.,Y. Stefanakos, E. and Sabau, A.S., “Organic Fluids in a Supercritical Rankine Cycle for Low Temperature Power Generation”, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Vol. 135, No. 4, (2013), 042002.
4.     Shokati, N., Ranjbar, F. and Mohammadkhani, F., “Comparison of Single-stage and Two-stage Tubular SOFC-GT Hybrid Cycles: Energy and Exergy Viewpoints”, International Journal of Engineering - Transactions A: Basics, Vol. 28, No. 4, (2015), 618–626.
5.     Kim, H.J., Moon, J.H. and Kim, Y.H., “Design and testing of an algebraic scroll expander for power generation from a waste heat recovery system”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, Vol. 229, No. 8, (2015), 1019–1031.
6.     Hettiarachchi, H.M., Golubovic, M., Worek, W.M. and Ikegami, Y., “The Performance of the Kalina Cycle System 11(KCS-11) With Low-Temperature Heat Sources”, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Vol. 129, No. 3, (2007), 243–247.
7.     Nami, H., Mohammadkhani, F. and Ranjbar, F., “Thermodynamic Analysis and Optimization of a Novel Cogeneration System: Combination of a gas Turbine with Supercritical CO2 and Organic Rankine Cycles (TECHNICAL NOTE)”, International Journal of Engineering - Transactions C: Aspects, Vol. 29, No. 12, (2016), 1765–1774.
8.     Roy, J.P., Mishra, M.K. and Misra, A., “Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using Organic Rankine Cycle”, Energy, Vol. 35, No. 12, (2010), 5049–5062.
9.     Peris, B., Navarro-Esbrí, J., Molés, F., Collado, R. and Mota-Babiloni, A., “Performance evaluation of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for power applications from low grade heat sources”, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 75, (2015), 763–769.
10.   Khankari, G., Karmakar, S., “Power generation from coal mill rejection using Kalina cycle”, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Vol. 138, No. 5, (2016), 052004.
11.   Delft University of Technology, Cycle-Tempo Release 5.0, software, (2008), http://
12.   Suresh, M.V.J.J., Reddy, K.S. and Kolar, A.K., “4-E (Energy, Exergy, Environment, and Economic) analysis of solar thermal aided coal-fired power plants”, Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 14, No. 4, (2010), 267–279.