International Journal of Engineering

International Journal of Engineering

A Modified Impedance-Based Loss of Field Detection Method of Synchronous Generator in the Presence of Series Capacitor and its Over-voltage Devices

Document Type : Original Article

Author
H. Yaghobi
Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
10.5829/ije.2026.39.08b.09
Abstract
Loss of field (LOF) detection of synchronous generators in power networks compensated with series capacitors (SCs) create challenging conditions. Fault currents passing through the capacitors can generate over-voltages that exceed the SC ratings, necessitating protection by Metal Oxide Varistors (MOVs). However, when the MOV and capacitor are part of the fault impedance loop, unfavorable conditions arise for LOF relays, including current and voltage fluctuations, high-frequency oscillations from MOVs, and sub-harmonic oscillations. Therefore, this work presents a new modified impedance-based function for LOF protection in the presence of a series capacitor and its over-voltage devices. An analytical solution is proposed to correct the impacts of SCs on LOF protection, which has not been documented previously. The non-linear behavior of the varistor in parallel with the series capacitor is approximated using a linear series R-X impedance model. The operation of the modified LOF function is considered with various capacitor placements, and power network variations such as compensation levels and load changes under complete and partial LOF scenarios. Simulations conducted in MATLAB/Simulink demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method, highlighting its independence from the power system structure while addressing existing relay challenges.

Graphical Abstract

A Modified Impedance-Based Loss of Field Detection Method of Synchronous Generator in the Presence of Series Capacitor and its Over-voltage Devices
Keywords
Synchronous Generator Series Capacitor Loss of Field Relay Over
voltage Devices

Subjects

  1. Yaghobi H. Precision enhancement of the traditional sub‐synchronous analysis by using frequency components of instantaneous magnetic flux. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution. 2021;15(22):3100-14. https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12243
  2. Abbasi M, Shayestehkhah H, Tousi B. Application of an additive self-tuning controller for static synchronous series compensator for damping of sub-synchronous resonance oscillations. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications. 2018;31(4):564-73. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2018.31.04a.07
  3. Firouzjah KG. Fault location on compensated transmission lines without current measurement. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions C: Aspects. 2018;31(12):2044-51. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2018.31.12c.08
  4. Anderson PM, Henville CF, Rifaat R, Johnson B, Meliopoulos S. Power system protection: John Wiley & Sons; 2021.
  5. Yaghobi H, Mortazavi H, Ansari K, Rajabi Mashhadi H, Khorashadzadeh H, Borzoe H, editors. A novel flux-based method for synchronous generator loss of excitation protection. 25th International Power System Conference, PSC2010, Nov. 2010, Tehran, Iran. 2010. https://civilica.com/doc/133208/
  6. Haseli MR, Haghjoo F, Hasani A. A new air gap flux‐based technique to detect loss of field in synchronous generators. IET Electric power applications. 2024;18(5):543-55. https://doi.org/10.1049/elp2.12410
  7. Yaghobi H. A new adaptive impedance-based LOE protection of synchronous generator in the presence of STATCOM. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 2017;32(6):2489-99. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2017.2647746
  8. Ghorbani A, Soleymani S, Mozafari B. A PMU-based LOE protection of synchronous generator in the presence of GIPFC. IEEE Transactions on power delivery. 2015;31(2):551-8. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TPWRD.2015.2440314
  9. Elsamahy M, Faried SO, Sidhu T. Impact of midpoint STATCOM on generator loss of excitation protection. IEEE Transactions on power delivery. 2013;29(2):724-32. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2281581
  10. Dolatabadi S, Seyedi H, Tohidi S. A new method for loss of excitation protection of synchronous generators in the presence of static synchronous compensator based on the discrete wavelet transform. Electric Power Systems Research. 2022;209:107981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.107981
  11. Hasani A, Liang X, Sanaye-Pasand M, Abedini M, Haghjoo F, Bak CL. Loss of Field Protection for Synchronous Generators: Current Practice and Future Trends. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2025. https://doi: 10.1109/TIA.2025.3573992
  12. Ghassemi F, Goodarzi J, Johns A, editors. Method for eliminating the effect of MOV operation on digital distance relays when used in series compensated lines. The 1997 32 nd Universities Power Engineering Conference, UPEC'97 Part 1(of 2); 1997.
  13. Biswal M, Pati BB, Pradhan AK. Adaptive distance relay setting for series compensated line. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2013;52:198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.03.018
  14. Ghassemi F, Johns A. Investigation of alternative residual current compensation for improving series compensated line distance protection. IEEE transactions on power delivery. 2002;5(2):567-74. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/61.53058
  15. Bachmann B, Novosel D, Hart D, Hu Y, Saha MM, editors. Application of artificial neural networks for series compensated line protection. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent System Application to Power Systems; 1996: IEEE.
  16. Fahim SR, Sarker SK, Muyeen S, Sheikh MRI, Das SK, Simoes M. A robust self-attentive capsule network for fault diagnosis of series-compensated transmission line. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 2021;36(6):3846-57. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TPWRD.2021.3049861
  17. Taheri MM, Seyedi H, Nojavan M, Khoshbouy M, Ivatloo BM. High-speed decision tree based series-compensated transmission lines protection using differential phase angle of superimposed current. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 2018;33(6):3130-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2018.2861841
  18. Parikh UB, Das B, Maheshwari RP. Combined wavelet-SVM technique for fault zone detection in a series compensated transmission line. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 2008;23(4):1789-94. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2008.919395
  19. Ebadi A, Hosseini S, Abdoos A. A new restricted earth fault relay based on artificial intelligence. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics. 2019;32(1):62-70. https://doi.org/10.5829/IJE.2019.32.01a.08
  20. Samantaray S, Dash P, Panda G. Distance relaying for transmission line using support vector machine and radial basis function neural network. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2007;29(7):551-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2007.01.007
  21. Jena MK, Samantaray S. Intelligent relaying scheme for series-compensated double circuit lines using phase angle of differential impedance. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2015;70:17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.01.035
  22. Rahmkhoda E, Faiz J, Abedini M. Detection of loss-of-excitation in synchronous machines using hybrid GMDH neural network intelligent algorithm in the presence of UPFC in power system. Electric Power Components and Systems. 2023;51(10):972-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2023.2187096
  23. Rahmkhoda E, Faiz J, Abedini M. Detecting loss of excitation condition of synchronous generator in the presence of unified power flow controller based on data mining method. Electric Power Systems Research. 2024;228:109975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2023.109975
  24. Silva H, Coelho A, Faria I, Araujo B. ANN based impedance trajectory detection approach for loss of excitation protection of synchronous generators connected to transmission lines with SVCs. Electric Power Systems Research. 2022;213:108766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108766
  25. Gulati V, Verma K, editors. Supervised Machine Learning to Identify Loss of Excitation and Power Swing in a Generator. 2023 7th International Conference on Computer Applications in Electrical Engineering-Recent Advances (CERA); 2023: IEEE. 10.1109/CERA59325.2023.10455561
  26. Ramadoss H, Muthiah G. Ensemble machine learning approach to identify excitation failure in synchronous generators. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2023;152:107506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107506
  27. Noori H, Yaghobi H. A Protection for Loss of Field in Synchronous Generator in Presence of Series Compensation Capacitor. International Journal of Engineering Transactions C: Aspects. 2024;37(9):1857-67. https://doi.org/10.5829/IJE.2024.37.09C.15
  28. Zoghi M, Yaghobi H. Synchronous generator dual estimation using sigma points Kalman filter. International Journal of Engineering Transactions A: Basics. 2024;37(07):1239. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2024.37.07a.04
  29. H. A-A. Reduce harmonic orders of voltage waveform in the synchronous generator by changing the winding structure. International Journal of Engineering Transactions B: Applications. 2025;38(8):2008-17. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2025.38.08b.22
  30. Berdy J. Loss of excitation protection for modern synchronous generators. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and systems. 2006;94(5):1457-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-PAS.1975.31987
  31. Hasani A, Haghjoo F. A secure and setting-free technique to detect loss of field in synchronous generators. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion. 2017;32(4):1512-22. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TEC.2017.2697501
  32. Marchi P, Estevez PG, Messina F, Galarza CG. Loss of excitation detection in synchronous generators based on dynamic state estimation. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion. 2020;35(3):1606-16. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2020.2985529
  33. Momeni E, Yaghobi H, Shahzadi A. Using dynamic state estimation to detect loss of excitation in synchronous generators. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution. 2024;18(3):639-52. https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.13106
  34. Sauer PW, Pai MA, Chow JH. Power system dynamics and stability: with synchrophasor measurement and power system toolbox: John Wiley & Sons; 2017.
  35. Yaghobi H. Fast discrimination of stable power swing with synchronous generator loss of excitation. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution. 2016;10(7):1682-90. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1045
  36. Goldsworthy DL. A linearized model for MOV-protected series capacitors. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2007;2(4):953-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.1987.4335284
  37. Marttila R. Performance of distance relay mho elements on MOV-protected series-compensated transmission lines. IEEE transactions on power delivery. 2002;7(3):1167-78. https://doi.org/10.1109/61.141827
  38. Yaghobi H. Real-Time Discrimination of Symmetrical Faults from Power Swings. Iranian Journal of Electrical & Electronic Engineering. 2023;19(2). https://doi.org/10.22068/IJEEE.19.2.2658
  39. Yaghobi H. Out-of-step protection of generator using analysis of angular velocity and acceleration data measured from magnetic flux. Electric Power Systems Research. 2016;132:9-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.11.003
  40. Edition S. The authoritative dictionary of ieee standards terms. IEEE Std. 2000:100-2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2000.322230
International Journal of Engineering
Volume 39, Issue 8
TRANSACTIONS B: Applications
August 2026
Pages 1878-1892