International Journal of Engineering

International Journal of Engineering

Comparative Performance Evaluation of Savonius Vertical Axis Wind Turbines: Two and Three-bladed Profiles

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
A. Sadeghi 1, 2
T. B. Gorji 1
M. Gorji-bandpy 3
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mazandaran Institution of Technology, Babol, Iran
2 Aerodynamic Laboratory of Mechanical Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran
3 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran
10.5829/ije.2026.39.05b.11
Abstract
In recent decades, the environmental impact of energy production has led to growing global efforts to transition from polluting fossil fuels to renewable energy sources, attracting considerable attention from organizations and researchers. This transition is essential due to escalating environmental concerns and the limited availability of fossil fuels. Concurrently, the deployment of wind turbines worldwide has expanded significantly. This study aims to propose an optimal Savonius vertical axis wind turbine design suited for urban applications. Two turbine models featuring different blade numbers and profiles were designed, constructed, and experimentally tested. The turbines comprised double- and triple-blade configurations, utilizing semicircular and Du06-W-200 blade profiles. Performance evaluation focused on key parameters including power coefficient, final rotational speed, power output, tip speed ratio, and time to reach maximum rotational speed. The results demonstrated that the semicircular double-blade turbine delivered the highest final rotational speed of 1433 RPM, approximately 33% higher than the three-bladed semicircular turbine and over 160% higher than the Du06-profiled turbines. It also achieved the highest power coefficient among all turbines tested. The two-blade turbine (Du06-W-200) profile exhibited the fastest acceleration, reaching its final speed in only 11 seconds, twice as fast as the two-bladed semicircular turbine and three times faster than the three-bladed semicircular configuration. While the Du06-profiled turbines showed slightly lower tip speed ratios, the three-bladed semicircular turbine exhibited the most stable power output. These findings indicate that Savonius turbines with the tested configurations are well-suited for urban environments, though their effectiveness depends strongly on local geographical and climatic conditions.

Graphical Abstract

Comparative Performance Evaluation of Savonius Vertical Axis Wind Turbines: Two and Three-bladed Profiles
Keywords
Wind Turbine
Semi-circular
Du06-W-200 Profile
Power Coefficient
Speed-up Time
Rotational Speed

Subjects

  1. Benbouhenni H. Amelioration effectiveness of torque and rotor flux control applied to the asynchronous generator for dual-rotor wind turbine using neural third-order sliding mode approaches. International Journal of Engineering Transactions C: Aspects. 2022;35(3):517-30. doi: 10.5829/ije.2022.35.03C.04.
  2. Adelekan OA, Ilugbusi BS, Adisa O, Obi OC, Awonuga KF, Asuzu OF, Ndubuisi NL. Energy transition policies: a global review of shifts towards renewable sources. Engineering Science & Technology Journal. 2024;5(2):272-87. doi:  10.51594/estj.v5i2.752.
  3. Asgari S, Menhaj M, Suratgar AA, Kazemi M. A disturbance observer based fuzzy feedforward proportional integral load frequency control of microgrids. International Journal of Engineering Transactions A: Basics 2021; 34(7): 1694-1702.. doi:  10.5829/ije.2021.34.07a.13.;
  4. Al Mubarak F, Rezaee R, Wood DA. Economic, Societal, and Environmental Impacts of Available Energy Sources: A Review. Engineering. 2024;5(3):1232-65. doi:  10.3390/eng5030067.
  5. Fard SK, Ahmadi H, Elizei MA. Electricity Supply Model of Conventional Residential Buildings in Tehran with Priority on Renewable Energy Using Adaptive Fuzzy-neural Inference System. ternational Journal of Engineering Transactions A: Basics 2023; 34(10): 1793-1814. doi:  10.5829/ije.2023.36.10a.07.
  6. Bozsik N, Szeberényi A, Bozsik N. Impact of Climate Change on the Performance of Household-Scale Photovoltaic Systems. HighTech and Innovation Journal. 2024;5(1):1-15. doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2024-05-01-01.
  7. Woodruff TJ. Health effects of fossil fuel–derived endocrine disruptors. New England Journal of Medicine. 2024;390(10):922-33. doi:  10.1056/NEJMra2300476.
  8. Shame BH, Tjahjana DD, Aziz M, Mbumba MT. Analysis of Seasonal Wind Energy Potential on Zanzibar Coastal Island. HighTech and Innovation Journal. 2024;5(2):331-48. doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2024-05-02-08.
  9. Carfora A, Pansini RV, Scandurra G. Energy dependence, renewable energy generation and import demand: Are EU countries resilient? Renewable Energy. 2022;195:1262-74. doi:   10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.098.
  10. Chegini S, Asadbeigi M, Ghafoorian F, Mehrpooya M. An investigation into the self-starting of Darrieus-Savonius hybrid wind turbine and performance enhancement through innovative deflectors: A CFD approach. Ocean Engineering. 2023;287:115910. doi:  10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115910.
  11. Hannan M, Al-Shetwi AQ, Mollik M, Ker PJ, Mannan M, Mansor M, Al-Masri HM, Mahlia TI. Wind energy conversions, controls, and applications: a review for sustainable technologies and directions. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):3986. doi: 10.3390/su15053986.
  12. Foomani AH, Moradlou M, Nazarian P. Utilizing a New Voltage Stability Index in Distribution Power System in Presence of Wind Turbine Units. International Journal of Engineering Transactions A: Basics. 2024;37(4):711-24. doi: 10.5829/ije.2024.37.04a.11
  13. Veers P, Bottasso CL, Manuel L, Naughton J, Pao L, Paquette J, Robertson A, Robinson M, Ananthan S, Barlas T, Bianchini A. Grand challenges in the design, manufacture, and operation of future wind turbine systems. Wind Energy Science. 2023;8(7):1071-131. doi: 10.5194/wes-8-1071-2023.
  14. Usman FO, Ani EC, Ebirim W, Montero DJP, Olu-lawal KA, Ninduwezuor-Ehiobu N. Integrating renewable energy solutions in the manufacturing industry: challenges and opportunities: a review. Engineering Science & Technology Journal. 2024;5(3):674-703. doi: 10.51594/estj.v5i3.865 .
  15. Cruz-Pérez N, Rodríguez Alcántara JS, Koronaiou VL, Jančula A, Rodríguez-Martín J, García Gil A, Fontes JC, Santamarta JC. . SWOT analysis of the benefits of hydropower energy in four archipelagos. Civil Engineering Journal 2024; 10(7). doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-07-019.
  16. Elgendi M, AlMallahi M, Abdelkhalig A, Selim MY. A review of wind turbines in complex terrain. International Journal of Thermofluids. 2023:100289. doi:   10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100289.
  17. Al-Rawajfeh MA, Gomaa MR. Comparison between horizontal and vertical axis wind turbine. International Journal of Applied. 2023;12(1):13-23. doi:   10.11591/ijape.v12.i1.pp13-23.
  18. Elkodama A, Ismaiel A, Abdellatif A, Shaaban S, Yoshida S, Rushdi MA. Control Methods for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines (HAWT): State-of-the-Art Review. Energies. 2023;16(17):6394. doi:  10.3390/en16176394.
  19. Yusof A, Mohamed M, editors. Vertical Axis Wind Turbines: An Overview. InECCE2019: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Electrical, Control & Computer Engineering, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia, 29th July 2019; 2020: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2317-5_68.
  20. Karimian S, Saham S. Power and Ventilation Performance Study in a Modified Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Based on Semi-analytical Approach. International Journal of Engineering Transactions A: Basics. 2023;36(7):1331-42. doi: 10.5829/ije.2023.36.07a.14
  21. Cuevas-Carvajal N, Cortes-Ramirez J, Norato JA, Hernandez C, Montoya-Vallejo M. Effect of geometrical parameters on the performance of conventional Savonius VAWT: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022;161:112314. doi:  10.1016/j.rser.2022.112314.
  22. Karmakar SD, Chattopadhyay H. A review of augmentation methods to enhance the performance of vertical axis wind turbine. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2022;53:102469. doi:  10.1016/j.seta.2022.102469.
  23. Maldar NR, Ng CY, Oguz E. A review of the optimization studies for Savonius turbine considering hydrokinetic applications. Energy Conversion and Management. 2020;226:113495. doi:  10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113495.
  24. Deda Altan B, Gultekin GS. Investigation of Performance Enhancements of Savonius Wind Turbines through Additional Designs. Processes. 2023;11(5):1473. doi:  10.3390/pr11051473.
  25. Wong KH, Chong WT, Sukiman NL, Poh SC, Shiah Y-C, Wang C-T. Performance enhancements on vertical axis wind turbines using flow augmentation systems: A review. Renewable and sustainable Energy reviews. 2017;73:904-21. doi:  10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.160.
  26. Layeghmand K, Ghiasi Tabari N, Zarkesh M. Improving efficiency of Savonius wind turbine by means of an airfoil-shaped deflector. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2020;42(10):528. doi:  10.1007/s40430-020-02598-7.
  27. Yuwono T, Sakti G, Aulia FN, Wijaya AC. Improving the performance of Savonius wind turbine by installation of a circular cylinder upstream of returning turbine blade. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2020;59(6):4923-32. doi:  10.1016/j.aej.2020.09.009.
  28. Nimvari ME, Fatahian H, Fatahian E. Performance improvement of a Savonius vertical axis wind turbine using a porous deflector. Energy Conversion and Management. 2020;220:113062. doi:  10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113062.
  29. Mohammadi M, Mohammadi R, Ramadan A, Mohamed M. Numerical investigation of performance refinement of a drag wind rotor using flow augmentation and momentum exchange optimization. Energy. 2018;158:592-606. doi:  10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.072.
  30. Kalluvila JB, Sreejith B. Numerical and experimental study on a modified Savonius rotor with guide blades. International Journal of Green Energy. 2018;15(12):744-57. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2018.1529574.
  31. Amin M, ZoheirSaboohi HHM, Osgouie KG. Investigation of the factors affecting the performance of Savonius wind turbine. Journal of Renewable Energy and New Energy. 2023;10(2). doi:  10.52547/jrenew.10.2.192.
  32. Wenehenubun F, Saputra A, Sutanto H. An experimental study on the performance of Savonius wind turbines related with the number of blades. Energy procedia. 2015;68:297-304. doi:  10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.259.
  33. Gumilar L, Kusumawardana A, Habibi MA, Afandi AN, Prihanto D, Aji AF, editors. Performance analysis of vertical wind turbine type Savonius-L based on wind speed, rotation speed, and number of blades. 2019 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic); 2019: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ISEMANTIC.2019.8884302.
  34. Prabowoputra DM, Prabowo AR. Effect of Geometry Modification on Turbine Performance: Mini-Review of Savonius Rotor. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research. 2022;11(10):777-83. doi: 10.18178/ijmerr.11.10.777-783.
  35. Al-Shammari SA, Karamallah AH, Aljabair S, editors. Blade shape optimization of savonius wind turbine at low wind energy by artificial neural network. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; 2020: IOP Publishing. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/881/1/012154.
  36. Tartuferi M, D'Alessandro V, Montelpare S, Ricci R. Enhancement of Savonius wind rotor aerodynamic performance: a computational study of new blade shapes and curtain systems. Energy. 2015;79:371-84. doi:  10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.023.
  37. Hosseini Imeni SZ, Kaabinejadian A, Ami Ahmadi H, Moghimi M. Optimal design and sensitivity analysis of airfoil-shaped rotor blade for Savonius wind turbine by using response surface methodology. Wind Engineering. 2022;46(4):1203-23. doi: 10.1177/0309524X211072868.
  38. Shamsuddin M, Kamaruddin NM. Experimental study on the characterization of the self-starting capability of a single and double-stage Savonius turbine. Results in Engineering. 2023;17:100854. doi:  10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100854.
  39. Ikonwa C, Gale W, Ingham D, Ma L, Pourkashanian MJIJoES. Investigation of airfoil profiles for use in self-starting, small-scale, low reynolds number vertical axis wind turbines. The International Journal of Environmental Sustainability 2016;12(3):33-52. doi:  10.18848/2325-1077/CGP/v12i03/33-52.
  40. Zamani M, Sangtarash A, Maghrebi MJ. Numerical study of porous media effect on the blade surface of vertical axis wind turbine for enhancement of aerodynamic performance. Energy Conversion and Management. 2021;245:114598. doi:  10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114598.
  41. Patel MR. Wind and solar power systems. 2009. doi: 10.1201/9781003042952.
  42. Morshed KN. Experimental and numerical investigations on aerodynamic characteristics of Savonius wind turbine with various overlap ratios. 2010. URL: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/773.
  43. Bourhis M, Zhang S, Pereira M, Ravelet F, editors. Wind tunnel experimental study of the effects of blade number on the performance and starting behavior of a low tip-speed ratio and micro-scale wind turbine at fixed blade geometry. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air; 2023: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. doi: 10.3390/fluids9120299.
  44. Farzadi R, Bazargan M. 3D numerical simulation of the Darrieus vertical axis wind turbine with J-type and straight blades under various operating conditions including self-starting mode. Energy. 2023;278:128040. doi:   10.1016/j.energy.2023.128040.
  45. Du L, Ingram G, Dominy RG. A review of H-Darrieus wind turbine aerodynamic research. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 2019;233(23-24):7590-616. doi: 10.1177/0954406219885962.
  46. Alomar Z, Khoury G, Rishmany J, Daaboul M. Numerical and Experimental Study on the Effect of Overlap on Savonius Wind Turbine. International Journal of Power and Energy Systems. 2023;43(10):2023.203-0450. doi: 10.2316/J.2023.203-0450.
  47. Ali MH. Experimental comparison study for Savonius wind turbine of two & three blades at low wind speed. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER). 2013 Sep;3(5):2978-86.
  48. Halmy MSM, Didane DH, Afolabi LO, Al-Alimi S. Computational fluid dynamics (cfd) study on the effect of the number of blades on the performance of double-stage savonius rotor. CFD Letters. 2021;13(4):1-10. doi: 10.37934/cfdl.13.4.110.
  49. Thiyagaraj J, Rahamathullah I, Anbuchezhiyan G, Barathiraja R, Ponshanmugakumar A. Influence of blade numbers, overlap ratio and modified blades on performance characteristics of the savonius hydro-kinetic turbine. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021;46:4047-53. doi:  10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.568.
International Journal of Engineering
Volume 39, Issue 5
TRANSACTIONS B: Applications
May 2026
Pages 1176-1190