Integral Assessment of Influence Mechanism of Heavy Particle Generator on Hydrocarbon Composition of Vehicles Motor Fuel

Document Type : Saint Petersburg Mining University 2024 Special Issue (SPMU)

Authors

1 Department of Transport and Technological Processes and Machines, Empress Catherine II Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

2 Department of Chemical Technology and Energy Processing, Empress Catherine II Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

3 Scientific Center "Issues of Processing Mineral and Technogenic Resources", Empress Catherine II Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

Abstract

This article presents the results of engine and laboratory tests with fuel before and after treatment with a heavy particle generator. The results of the research have shown that in the course of conducted research the impact of heavy particle generator on fuel during engine tests leads to an increase in its detonation resistance and a reduction in fuel consumption (up to 15%), as well as significantly improves the environmental performance of the engine. The reduction in concentration of carbon monoxide (CO) from 0.09% to 0.03%, carbon dioxide - by 6% and nitrogen oxides - by 7%. The results of research of hydrocarbon composition of fuels by GC-MS method have shown that the impact of heavy particles generator have a favorable effect on the octane number of gasoline, as well as low-temperature properties of diesel fuel. The change of engine operation parameters after the impact of heavy particles generator is established. The change can occur as a result of complex influence on fuel and engine systems, and as a result of influence on a single factor, which is the root cause of the subsequent change of parameters.

Graphical Abstract

Integral Assessment of Influence Mechanism of Heavy Particle Generator on Hydrocarbon Composition of Vehicles Motor Fuel

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Litvinenko VS, Tsvetkov PS, Dvoynikov MV, Buslaev GV. Barriers to implementation of hydrogen initiatives in the context of global energy sustainable development. Записки Горного Института. 2020;244:428-38. https://doi.org/10.31897/pmi.2020.4.421
  2. Nazarenko MY, Kondrasheva N, Saltykova S. Sorptional properties of fuel shale and spent shale. Coke and Chemistry. 2017;60(2):86-9. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X17020053
  3. Boichenko S, Yakovlieva A, Zaporozhets O, Karakoc TH, Shkilniuk I. Chemmotological Aspects of Sustainable Development of Transport: Springer; 2022.
  4. MacLean HL, Lave LB. Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies. Progress in energy and combustion science. 2003;29(1):1-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(02)00032-1
  5. Nelyubov DV, Fakhrutdinov MI, Sarkisyan AA, Sharin EA, Ershov MA, Makhova UA, et al. New Prospects of Waste Involvement in Marine Fuel Oil: Evolution of Composition and Requirements for Fuel with Sulfur Content up to 0.5%. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023;11(7):1460. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071460
  6. Sultanbekov R, Denisov K, Zhurkevich A, Islamov S. Reduction of Sulphur in Marine Residual Fuels by Deasphalting to Produce VLSFO. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022;10(11):1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10111765
  7. Abdellatief TM, Ershov MA, Savelenko VD, Kapustin VM, Makhova UA, Abdelkareem MA, et al. A novelty detection diagnostic methodology for merit function calculations for various individual gasoline components. Fuel. 2023;344:128050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128050
  8. Sultanbekov RR, Schipachev AM. Manifestation of incompatibility of marine residual fuels: A method for determining compatibility, studying composition of fuels and sediment. Записки Горного института. 2022;257:843-52. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2022.56
  9. Iuzmukhametova R, Boldushevskii R, Shmelkova O, Khamzin Y, Minaev A, Nikulshin P. Adsorptive treatment of residues on macroporous adsorbent for marine fuel production scheme on refinery. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023;11(3):525. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11030525
  10. Povarov VG, Efimov II. Use of the UNIFAC model in the calculation of physicochemical properties of ecotoxicants for technological and ecoanalytical purposes. Записки Горного института. 2023(260 (eng)):238-47. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2023.41
  11. Pyagay I, Zubkova O, Zubakina M, Sizyakov V. Method for Decontamination of Toxic Aluminochrome Catalyst Sludge by Reduction of Hexavalent Chromium. Inorganics. 2023;11(7):284. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11070284
  12. Seregin E, Volgin S. Chemmotology in Development. Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils. 2014;50(5):369-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-014-0535-z
  13. Yu L-l, Zhao C-z, Liu S-j, Di M. Alkane influence of combustion products in polyethylene and gasoline. Procedia Engineering. 2013;52:566-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.186
  14. Badra J, Alowaid F, Alhussaini A, Alnakhli A, AlRamadan AS. Understanding of the octane response of gasoline/MTBE blends. Fuel. 2022;318:123647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123647
  15. Ilyushin P, Vyatkin K, Kozlov A. Development of a method for estimating thermal conductivity of organic deposits on the wax flow loop laboratory installation. International Journal of Engineering. 2022;35(6):1178-85. https://doi.org/10.5829/IJE.2022.35.06C.09
  16. Li Q. Effects of Drilling Mud Properties on Hydrate Dissociation Around Wellbore during Drilling Operation in Hydrate Reservoir. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics. 2022;35(1):142-9. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2022.35.01A.13
  17. Cherepovitsyn A, Kazanin A, Rutenko E. Strategic Priorities for Green Diversification of Oil and Gas Companies. Energies. 2023;16(13):4985. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16134985
  18. Svakhina YA, Titova ME, Pyagay IN. Products of Apatite-Nepheline Ore Processing in the Synthesis of Low-Modulus Zeolites. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology. 2023;8(1):49-64. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v8i1.51979
  19. Cherepovitsyn A, Lebedev A. Drill Cuttings Disposal Efficiency in Offshore Oil Drilling. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023;11(2):317. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11020317
  20. Rozhkova Y, Lekomtsev A, Lisin V, Poilov V, Safiullina E, Efremenko D, et al. Comprehensive Review of Demulsifiers based on Magnetic Nanoparticles for Oil-water and Water-oil Separation. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications. 2024;37(5):904-19. 10.5829/IJE.2024.37.05B.09
  21. Tcvetkov P. Climate policy imbalance in the energy sector: Time to focus on the value of CO2 utilization. Energies. 2021;14(2):411. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020411
  22. Kalghatgi GT. Auto-ignition quality of practical fuels and implications for fuel requirements of future SI and HCCI engines. SAE Technical Paper; 2005. Report No.: 0148-7191.
  23. Won SH, Haas FM, Dooley S, Edwards T, Dryer FL. Reconstruction of chemical structure of real fuel by surrogate formulation based upon combustion property targets. Combustion and Flame. 2017;183:39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.04.032
International Journal of Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 8
TRANSACTIONS B: Applications
August 2024
Pages 1700-1706

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics