Improvement of Sand Soil with Bio-micropiles and Bio-grout Injection in Reinforced Soils

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

The production of Portland cement, one of the most used materials in the construction industry, has increased environmental pollution and global warming. Soil bio-improvement is an eco-friendly and renewable method that has recently received attention. Microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) has been the most researched for bio-geotechnical issues. Sporosarcina pasteurii is a micro-organism that produces urease enzymes and was used for sand soil improvement in this study. Also, the type of grout and injection method were selected as variables. The result of the test showed that the use of bio-grout had a significant effect on increasing the bearing capacity of soil. Bio-micropiles increased the bearing capacity by more than 94%. This increase was 126% in the case of cement-grouted micropile. Also, the results of the tests showed that the bearing capacity of bio-improved soil and reinforced soil increased by 54% and 125%, respectively. This research showed that bio-micropile could be a suitable method to replace cement-grouted micropile.

Graphical Abstract

Improvement of Sand Soil with Bio-micropiles and Bio-grout Injection in Reinforced Soils

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Aggarwal S, Hozalski RM. Determination of biofilm mechanical properties from tensile tests performed using a micro-cantilever method. Biofouling. 2010;26(4):479-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927011003793080
  2. Taghavi L, Emedzadeh M. Experimental study on the factors affecting hexavalent chromium bioreduction by Bacillus cereus. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications. 2016;29(2):152-9. 10.5829/idosi.ije. 2016.29.02b.03
  3. Liu B, Zhu C, Tang C-S, Xie Y-H, Yin L-Y, Cheng Q, et al. Bio-remediation of desiccation cracking in clayey soils through microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP). Engineering geology. 2020;264:105389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105389
  4. Cheng L, Cord-Ruwisch R. Upscaling effects of soil improvement by microbially induced calcite precipitation by surface percolation. Geomicrobiology Journal. 2014;31(5):396-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2013.836579
  5. Achal V, Kawasaki S. Biogrout: A novel binding material for soil improvement and concrete repair. Frontiers in microbiology. 2016;7:179226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00314
  6. Chou C-W, Seagren EA, Aydilek AH, Lai M. Biocalcification of sand through ureolysis. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2011;137(12):1179-89. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000532
  7. Chae SH, Chung H, Nam K. Evaluation of microbially Induced calcite precipitation (MICP) methods on different soil types for wind erosion control. Environmental Engineering Research. 2021;26(1). https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2019.507
  8. Hemayati M, Nikooee E, Habibagahi G, Niazi A, Afzali SF. New non-ureolytic heterotrophic microbial induced carbonate precipitation for suppression of sand dune wind erosion. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):5845. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33070-w
  9. Abdlrahem MA, El Naggar MH. Axial performance of micropile groups in cohesionless soil from full-scale tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 2020;57(7):1006-24. 10.1139/cgj-2018-0695
  10. Chandiwala A, Vasanwala S. Experimental study of lateral loading on piled raft foundations on sandy soil. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics. 2023;36(1):28-34. 10.5829/ije.2023.36.01a.04
  11. Shahmandi A, Ghazavi M, Barkhordari K, Hashemi M. The Effect of Using Reinforced Granular Blanket and Single Stone Column on Improvement of Sandy Soil: Experimental Study. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications. 2023;36(8):1532-47. 10.5829/ije.2023.36.08b.13
  12. Goudar S, Kamatagi A. An experimental evaluation of axial load bearing capacity of belled and straight piles embedded in sand. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications. 2022;35(8):1599-607. 10.5829/ije.2022.35.08b.16
  13. Fry M. Cement, carbon dioxide, and the ‘necessity’narrative: A case study of Mexico. Geoforum. 2013;49:127-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.06.003
  14. Rebata-Landa V. Microbial activity in sediments: effects on soil behavior: Georgia Institute of Technology; 2007.
  15. Van Wijngaarden W, Vermolen F, Van Meurs G, Vuik C. Modelling biogrout: a new ground improvement method based on microbial-induced carbonate precipitation. Transport in porous media. 2011;87:397-420. 10.1007/s11242-010-9691-8
  16. Lin H. Microbial modification of soil for ground improvement: Lehigh University; 2016.
  17. Veludo J, Júlio E, Dias-da-Costa D. Compressive strength of micropile-to-grout connections. Construction and Building Materials. 2012;26(1):172-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat
  18. Karami A, Shooshpasha I, Alikhani H. Optimum Bacteria Suspension Volume for Stabilizing Silty Sand Soils by Sporosarcina pasteurii Bacteria. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics. 2022;35(10):1820-9. 10.5829/ije.2022.35.10a.02
  19. Henze J, Randall DG. Microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation at elevated pH values (> 11) using Sporosarcina pasteurii. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2018;6(4):5008-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.07.046
  20. Peng J, Liu Z. Influence of temperature on microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation for soil treatment. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218396. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218396