Enhancing Comfort in Tropical Institutional Buildings: Integrating Thermal, Acoustic and Visual Performance with a Unified Index

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Warangal, Telangana State, India

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between a country's level of development and its educational standards, emphasizing the significance of well-equipped universities in ensuring high-quality education. While research on comfort in educational buildings has often focused on individual parameters, such as thermal, acoustic, and visual elements, this paper proposes a new metric that integrates these factors to assess environmental comfort. The research was conducted in six hostel rooms at the National Institute of Technology Warangal (NITW) campus in India, utilizing both objective measurements and subjective surveys. Three single measures were introduced: a thermo-hygrometric index, an audio comfort index, and a visual illumination index, each normalized within a 0-1 range denoting comfort and discomfort conditions. A final total comfort index for each room was established by assigning appropriate weights to the three factors. The findings were compared to the questionnaire responses, evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. The results indicate a comprehensive assessment of indoor environmental comfort, with acoustic factors showing the least impact on overall comfort conditions. The study recommends equal weighting for thermal, acoustic, and lighting parameters when computing the combined comfort index. The building achieved an overall comfort rating of 0.64 out of 1, indicating a comfortable environment. The study also shows that there is a strong correlation between the new combined comfort index and the results from the questionnaire. `This research contributes a straightforward and integrated approach to gauge comfort levels in educational buildings and lays the groundwork for further assessments of institutional building performance.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. MHRD, D. “Educational Institutions Statistics India 2016.” Retrieved June 10, 2019, from http://dise.in/ and http://mhrd.gov.in/statist
  2. Nässén, J., Holmberg, J., Wadeskog, A., and Nyman, M. “Direct and indirect energy use and carbon emissions in the production phase of buildings: An input-output analysis.” Energy, Vol. 32, No. 9, (2007), 1593-1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.002
  3. Yohanis, Y. G., and Norton, B. “Life-cycle operational and embodied energy for a generic single-storey office building in the UK.” Energy, Vol. 27, No. 1, (2002), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00061-5
  4. Nistratov, A. V., Klimenko, N. N., Pustynnikov, I. V., and Vu, L. K. “Thermal Regeneration and Reuse of Carbon and Glass Fibers from Waste Composites.” Emerging Science Journal, Vol. 6, No. 5, (2022), 967-984. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-05-04
  5. Airaksinen, M., and Matilainen, P. “A Carbon footprint of an office building.” Energies, Vol. 4, No. 8, (2011), 1197-1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/en4081197
  6. Wu, H. J., Yuan, Z. W., Zhang, L., and Bi, J. “Life cycle energy consumption and CO2 emission of an office building in China.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 17, No. 2, (2012), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0342-2
  7. Yarramsetty, S., Rohullah, M. S., and Anand, M. V. N. S. “An investigation on energy consumption in residential building with different orientation : a BIM approach.” Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, No. 0123456789, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00189-z
  8. Thapa, S., Bansal, A. K., and Panda, G. K. “Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated office buildings in cold and cloudy climate of Darjeeling, India - An adaptive approach.” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 160, (2018), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.12.026
  9. Dear, R. De, Kim, J., Candido, C., Deuble, M., Dear, R. De, Kim, J., Candido, C., and Deuble, M. “classrooms Adaptive thermal comfort in Australian school classrooms,” No. May, (2015), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.991627
  10. BEE. “Energy benchmarks for Commercial Buildings Bureau of Energy Efficiency 4 th Floor, Sewa Bhawan, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-110066 Website : www.beenet.in.” Retrieved January 21, 2023, from http://eecbindia.com/
  11. Bangia, T., and Raskar, R. “Cohesive Methodology in Construction of Enclosure for 3.6m Devasthal Optical Telescope.” HighTech and Innovation Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, (2022), 162-174. https://doi.org/10.28991/HIJ-2022-03-02-05
  12. Barreca, F., Arcuri, N., Cardinali, G. D., Fazio, S. Di, Rollo, A., and Tirella, V. “A Highly Sustainable Timber-Cork Modular System for Lightweight Temporary Housing.” Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), Vol. 8, No. 10, (2022), 2336-2352. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-10-020
  13. BEE. Energy Conservation Building Code 2017.
  14. Rawal, R., Vaidya, P., Ghatti, V., Ward, A., Group, T. W., Seth, S., Jain, A., and Parthasarathy, T. “Energy Code Enforcement for Beginners : A Tiered Approach to Energy Code in India,” No. Cbre 2011, (2012), 313-324.
  15. Rincon, L., Castell, A., Perez, G., Sole, C., Boer, D., and Cabeza, L. F. “Evaluation of the environmental impact of experimental buildings with different constructive systems using Material Flow Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment.” Applied Energy, Vol. 109, (2013), 544-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.038
  16. Taherkhani, R., Alviri, M., Panahi, P., and Hashempour, N. “Low Embodied Carbon and Energy Materials in Building Systems: A Case Study of Reinforcing Clay Houses in Desert Regions.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, Vol. 36, No. 8, (2023), 1409-1428. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2023.36.08b.02
  17. Kumar, S. USAID ECO - III Project Energy Use in commercial buildings - Key findings from the national benchmarking study. Retrieved from USAID - INDIA
  18. Yang, Z., Becerik-gerber, B., and Mino, L. “A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms : Impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance.” Building and Environment, Vol. 70, (2013), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.030
  19. Ulla, Haverinen-shaughnessy; Shaughnessy, Richard J; Cole, Eugene C; Toyinbo, O., and Moschandreas, D. J. “An assessment of indoor environmental quality in schools and its association with health and performance.” Building and Environment, Vol. 93, (2015), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.006
  20. Wargocki, P., and Wyon, D. P. “Providing better thermal and air quality conditions in school classrooms would be cost-effective.” Building and Environment, Vol. 59, , (2013), 581-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.007
  21. Lee, M. C., Mui, K. W., Wong, L. T., Chan, W. Y., Lee, E. W. M., and Cheung, C. T. “Student learning performance and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in air-conditioned university teaching rooms.” Building and Environment, Vol. 49, No. 1, (2012), 238-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.10.001
  22. Toyinbo, O., Shaughnessy, R., Turunen, M., Putus, T., Metsamuuronen, J., Kurnitski, J., and Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U. “Building characteristics , indoor environmental quality , and mathematics achievement in Finnish elementary schools.” Building and Environment, Vol. 104, (2016), 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.030
  23. Doi, R. “Are New Residential Areas Cooler than Older Ones?” Emerging Science Journal, Vol. 6, No. 6, (2022), 1346-1357. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-06-08
  24. Musa, H. H., Hussein, A. M., Hanoon, A. N., Hason, M. M., and Abdulhameed, A. A. “Phases of Urban Development Impact on the Assessment of Thermal Comfort: A Comparative Environmental Study.” Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), Vol. 8, No. 5, (2022), 951-966. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-05-08
  25. Zomorodian, Z. S., Tahsildoost, M., and Hafezi, M. “Thermal comfort in educational buildings: A review article.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 59, , (2016), 895-906. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.033
  26. Nam, I., Yang, J., Lee, D., Park, E., and Sohn, J.-R. “A study on the thermal comfort and clothing insulation characteristics of preschool children in Korea.” Building and Environment, Vol. 92, (2015), 724-733. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.05.041
  27. Teli, D., Jentsch, M. F., and James, P. A. B. “The role of a building’s thermal properties on pupils’ thermal comfort in junior school classrooms as determined in field studies.” Building and Environment, Vol. 82, (2014), 640-654. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.10.005
  28. Almeida, R. M. S. F., Ramos, N. M. M., and de Freitas, V. P. “Thermal comfort models and pupils’ perception in free-running school buildings of a mild climate country.” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 111, (2016), 64-75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.066
  29. Trebilcock, M., Soto-Muñoz, J., Yañez, M., and Figueroa-San Martin, R. “The right to comfort: A field study on adaptive thermal comfort in free-running primary schools in Chile.” Building and Environment, Vol. 114, (2017), 455-469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.036
  30. Wang, D., Jiang, J., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Xu, Y., and Liu, J. “Student responses to classroom thermal environments in rural primary and secondary schools in winter.” Building and Environment, Vol. 115, (2017), 104-117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.01.006
  31. Yang, W., and Bradley, J. S. “Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 125, No. 2, (2009), 922-933. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3058900
  32. Klatte, M., Lachmann, T., and Meis, M. “Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting.” Noise and Health, Vol. 12, No. 49, (2010), 270-282. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.70506
  33. Hodgson, M. “Rating, ranking, and understanding acoustical quality in university classrooms.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 112, No. 2, (2002), 568-575. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1490363
  34. Zannin, P. H. T., and Marcon, C. R. “Objective and subjective evaluation of the acoustic comfort in classrooms.” Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 38, No. 5, (2007), 675-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.10.001
  35. Khalvati, F., and Omidvar, A. “Prediction of Noise Transmission Loss and Acoustic Comfort Assessment of a Ventilated Window using Statistical Energy Analysis.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions C: Aspects, Vol. 32, No. 3, (2019), 451-459. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2019.32.03c.14
  36. Michael, A., and Heracleous, C. “Assessment of natural lighting performance and visual comfort of educational architecture in Southern Europe: The case of typical educational school premises in Cyprus.” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 140, (2017), 443-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.087
  37. Meresi, A. “Evaluating daylight performance of light shelves combined with external blinds in south-facing classrooms in Athens, Greece.” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 116, (2016), 190-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.009
  38. Korsavi, S. S., Zomorodian, Z. S., and Tahsildoost, M. “Visual comfort assessment of daylit and sunlit areas: A longitudinal field survey in classrooms in Kashan, Iran.” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 128, (2016), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.091
  39. Rahman, N. A. A., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., and Akashah, F. W. “A Review of Optimization Techniques Application for Building Performance Analysis.” Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), Vol. 8, No. 4, (2022), 823-842. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-04-014
  40. Kharazi, B. A., Alvanchi, A., and Taghaddos, H. “A Novel Building Information Modeling-based Method for Improving Cost and Energy Performance of the Building Envelope.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, Vol. 33, No. 11, (2020), 2162-2173. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2020.33.11b.06
  41. Sutarja, I. N., Ardana, M. D. W., and Putra, I. D. G. A. D. “The post-disaster house: Simple instant house using lightweight steel structure, bracing, and local wood wall.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, Vol. 34, No. 2, (2021), 348-354. https://doi.org/10.5829/IJE.2021.34.02B.06
  42. Marans, R. W., and Yan, X. “Lighting quality and environmental satisfaction in open and enclosed offices.” The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, (1989), 118-131. https://doi.org/www.jstor.org/stable/43028916
  43. Chiang, C. M., and Lai, C. M. “A study on the comprehensive indicator of indoor environment assessment for occupants’ health in Taiwan.” Building and Environment, Vol. 37, No. 4, (2002), 387-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00034-8
  44. Astolfi, A., and Pellerey, F. “Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 123, No. 1, (2008), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2816563
  45. Wong, L. T., Mui, K. W., and Hui, P. S. “A multivariate-logistic model for acceptance of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in offices.” Building and Environment, Vol. 43, No. 1, (2008), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.01.001
  46. Cao, B., Ouyang, Q., Zhu, Y., Huang, L., Hu, H., and Deng, G. “Development of a multivariate regression model for overall satisfaction in public buildings based on field studies in Beijing and Shanghai.” Building and Environment, Vol. 47, No. 1, (2012), 394-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.06.022
  47. Ncube, M., and Riffat, S. “Developing an indoor environment quality tool for assessment of mechanically ventilated office buildings in the UK - A preliminary study.” Building and Environment, Vol. 53, (2012), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.003
  48. Marino, C., Nucara, A., and Pietrafesa, M. “Proposal of comfort classification indexes suitable for both single environments and whole buildings.” Building and Environment, Vol. 57, No. December 2002, (2012), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.04.012
  49. Fassio, F., Fanchiotti, A., and de Lieto Vollaro, R. “Linear, non-linear and alternative algorithms in the correlation of IEQ factors with global comfort: A case study.” Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 6, No. 11, (2014), 8113-8127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6118113
  50. Buratti, C., Belloni, E., Merli, F., and Ricciardi, P. “A new index combining thermal, acoustic, and visual comfort of moderate environments in temperate climates.” Building and Environment, Vol. 139, No. April, (2018), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.038
International Journal of Engineering
Volume 36, Issue 12
TRANSACTIONS C: Aspects
December 2023
Pages 2253-2263

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics