Reliability Evaluation of a Disaster Airflow Emergency Control System Based on Bayesian Networks

Document Type : Original Article


College of Mining Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, PR China


This study proposed a novel method for system failure reasoning based on Bayesian networks to solve emergency airflow control system reliability problems. A system fault tree model was established to identify the logical relationship between the units, which was then transformed into a Bayesian network fault analysis model to determine network node states and the conditional probability table, as well as to carry out diagnostic reasoning on the system node branches. The reliability analysis of the model based on Netica Bayesian tool shows that the probability of system failure caused by substation communication node is the highest under normal conditions, and data monitoring and central station communication nodes have a greater impact on intelligent control. By predicting and diagnosing system faults, the optimization of system design is realized on the framework of Bayesian network to improve the reliability, and there by establishing a theoretical foundation for future disaster prevention research.


1.     Wang, K., Haiqing, H., Jiang, S. G., Wu, Z. Y., and Shao, H., “Research on regional linkage and intelligent control system of mine fire wind and smoke flow.” Industry and Mine Automation, Vol. 45, No. 7, (2019), 21–27.
2.     Wang, K., Jiang, S. G., Zhang, W. Q., Wu, Z. Y., and Shao, H. “Numerical simulation and application research of mine fire emergency rescue system.” Journal of China Coal Society, Vol. 37, No. 5, (2012), 857–862. Retrieved from
3.     Lo, H. W., and Liou, J. J. H. “A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk assessment.” Applied Soft Computing Journal, Vol. 73, (2018), 684–696.
4.     Hyun, K. C., Min, S., Choi, H., Park, J., and Lee, I. M. “Risk analysis using fault-tree analysis (FTA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) applicable to shield TBM tunnels.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 49, (2015), 121–129.
5.     Peeters, J. F. W., Basten, R. J. I., and Tinga, T. “Improving failure analysis efficiency by combining FTA and FMEA in a recursive manner.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 172, (2018), 36–44.
6.     Galagedarage Don, M., and Khan, F. “Dynamic process fault detection and diagnosis based on a combined approach of hidden Markov and Bayesian network model.” Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 201, (2019), 82–96.
7.     Attaran, B., Ghanbarzadeh, A., and Moradi, S. “A Novel Intelligent Fault Diagnosis Approach for Critical Rotating Machinery in the Time-frequency Domain.” International Journal  of  Engineering  -  Transactions  A:  Basics, Vol. 33, No. 4, (2020), 668–675.
8.     Rajeev, D., Dinakaran, D., Kanthavelkumaran, N., and Austin, N. “Predictions of Tool Wear in Hard Turning of AISI4140 Steel through Artificial Neural Network, Fuzzy Logic and Regression Models.” International Journal of Engineering - Transactions A: Basics, Vol. 31, No. 1, (2018), 32–37.
9.     Ebtehaj, I., Bonakdari, H., and Zaji, A. H. “A new hybrid decision tree method based on two artificial neural networks for predicting sediment transport in clean pipes.” Alexandria Engineering Journal, Vol. 57, No. 3, (2018), 1783–1795.
10.   Liu, L., Wang, S., Hu, B., Qiong, Q., Wen, J., and Rosenblum, D. S. “Learning structures of interval-based Bayesian networks in probabilistic generative model for human complex activity recognition.” Pattern Recognition, Vol. 81, (2018), 545–561.
11.   Naili, M., Bourahla, M., Naili, M., and Tari, A. K. “Stability-based Dynamic Bayesian Network method for dynamic data mining.” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 77, (2019), 283–310.
12.   Tang, K., Parsons, D. J., and Jude, S. “Comparison of automatic and guided learning for Bayesian networks to analyse pipe failures in the water distribution system.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 186, (2019), 24–36.
13.   Liu, M., Stella, F., Hommersom, A., Lucas, P. J. F., Boer, L., and Bischoff, E. “A comparison between discrete and continuous time Bayesian networks in learning from clinical time series data with irregularity.” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Vol. 95, (2019), 104–117.
14.   Meng, Q. Q., Zhu, Q. X., Gao, H. H., He, Y. L., and Xu, Y. “A novel scoring function based on family transfer entropy for Bayesian networks learning and its application to industrial alarm systems.” Journal of Process Control, Vol. 76, (2019), 122–132.
15.   Guo, C., Khan, F., and Imtiaz, S. “Copula-based Bayesian network model for process system risk assessment.” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 123, (2019), 317–326.
16.   Dagum, P., and Luby, M. “Approximating probabilistic inference in Bayesian belief networks is NP-hard.” Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 60, No. 1, (1993), 141–153.
17.   Tong, X., Fang, W., Yuan, S., Ma, J., and Bai, Y. “Application of Bayesian approach to the assessment of mine gas explosion.” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 54, (2018), 238–245.
18.   Ping, P., Wang, K., Kong, D., and Chen, G. “Estimating probability of success of escape, evacuation, and rescue (EER) on the  offshore  platform  by  integrating  Bayesian  Network  and Fuzzy AHP.” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 54, (2018), 57–68.