Predicting Shear Capacity of Panel Zone Using Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Civil Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

2 Center of Excellence for Engineering and Management of Civil Infrastructures, School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


Investigating the behavior of the box-shaped column panel zone has been one of the major concerns of scientists in the field.  In the American Institute of Steel Construction the shear capacity of I-shaped cross- sections with low column thickness is calculated. This paper determines the shear capacity of panel zone in steel columns with box-shaped cross-sections by using artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA). It also compares ABAQUS finite element software outputs and AISC relations. Therefore, neural networks were trained using parametric information obtained from 510 connection models in ABAQUS software. The results show that the predicted shear capacity of the NN and the GA in comparison with the AISC relations use a wide range of all effective parameters in the calculation of the shear capacity of panel zone. Therefore, the use of artificial intelligence can be a good choice. Finally, the GA, along with optimization of a mathematical relation, has been able to minimize the error in determining the shear capacity of panel zones of steel-based columns, even at high column thicknesses.


1.     Arabzadeh, A., and Hizaji, R. “A Simple Approach to Predict the Shear Capacity and Failure Mode of Fix-ended Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams based on Experimental Study.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics, Vol. 32, No. 4, (2019), 474–483.
2.     AISC 360-05,Specification for structural steel buildings. Chicago(IL): American Institute of Steel Construction; (2010).
3.     Mansouri, I., and Saffari, H. “A fast hybrid algorithm for nonlinear analysis of structures.” ASIAN Journal of Civil Engineering (BHRC), Vol. 15, No. 2, (2014), 213–229.
4.     Chithra, S., Kumar, S. R. R. S., Chinnaraju, K., and Alfin Ashmita, F. “A comparative study on the compressive strength prediction models for High Performance Concrete containing nano silica and copper slag using regression analysis and Artificial Neural Networks.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 114, (2016), 528–535.
5.     Hartmann, S. “Project Scheduling with Multiple Modes: A Genetic Algorithm.” Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 102, No. 1–4, (2001), 111–135.
6.     Elhewy, A. H., Mesbahi, E., and Pu, Y. “Reliability analysis of structures using neural network method.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 21, No. 1, (2006), 44–53.
7.     VANLUCHENE, R. D., and SUN, R. “Neural Networks in Structural Engineering.” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 3, (1990), 207–215.
8.     Jenkins, W. M. “Plane Frame Optimum Design Environment Based on Genetic Algorithm.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 11, (1992), 3103–3112.
9.     Adeli, H. “Neural networks in civil engineering: 1989-2000.” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 2, (2001), 126–142.
10.   Sahoo, B., and Maity, D. “Damage assessment of structures using hybrid neuro-genetic algorithm.” Applied Soft Computing Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1, (2007), 89–104.
11.   Khalkhali, A., Nariman-Zadeh, N., Khakshournia, S., and Amiri, S. “Optimal Design of Sandwich Panels using Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm and Finite Element Method.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions C: Aspects, Vol. 27, No. 3, (2014), 395–402.
12.   Mallela, U. K., and Upadhyay, A. “Buckling load prediction of laminated  composite  stiffened  panels  subjected to in-plane shear using artificial neural networks.” Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 102, (2016), 158–164.
13.   Abambres, M., and Lantsoght, E. O. L. “Neural network-based formula for shear capacity prediction of one-way slabs under concentrated loads.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 211, (2020), 110501.
14.   Hoang, N. D. “Estimating punching shear capacity of steel fibre reinforced concrete slabs using sequential piecewise multiple linear regression and artificial neural network.” Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, Vol.
137, (2019), 58–70.
15.   Jang, B. W., and Kim, C. G. “Impact localization of composite stiffened panel with triangulation method using normalized magnitudes of fiber optic sensor signals.” Composite Structures, Vol. 211, (2019), 522–529.
16.   Hedayat, A. A., Ahmadi Afzadi, E., Kalantaripour, H., Morshedi, E., and Iranpour, A. “A new predictive model for the minimum strength requirement of steel moment frames using artificial neural network.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 116, , (2019), 69–81.
17.   Krawinkler, H., Popov, E., and Bertero, V. “Shear behavior of steel frame joints.” Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 101, No. 11, (1975), 2317–2336. Retrieved from
18.   Stojadinović, B., Goel, S. C., Lee, K. H., Margarian, A. G., and Choi, J. H. “Parametric tests on unreinforced steel moment connections.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 1, (2000), 40–49.
19.   Mansouri, I., and Saffari, H. “A new steel panel zone model including axial force for thin to thick column flanges.” Steel and Composite Structures, Vol. 16, No. 4, (2014), 417–436.
20.   Bayo, E., Loureiro, A., and Lopez, M. “Shear behaviour of trapezoidal column panels. I: Experiments and finite element modelling.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 108, (2015), 60–69.
21.           Ho, S. L., Xie, M., and Goh, T. N. “A comparative study of neural network and Box-Jenkins ARIMA modeling in time series prediction.” Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 3-4, 371–375.