Design of Broaching Tool Using Finite Element Method for Achieving the Lowest Residual Tensile Stress in Machining of Ti6Al4V Alloy

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

2 Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada


The aim of this study, is to use finite element simulation to achieve the optimal geometry of a broaching tool that creates the lowest tensile stress at the machined surface of the Ti6Al4V alloy. It plays a major role in reducing production costs and improves the surface integrity of the machined parts. The type and amount of residual stress determined by the thermal and mechanical loads transmitted to the workpiece. In this research, the two-dimensional simulation of the broaching process is done by finite element DEFORM-2D® software for the two end teeth of the tool that perform the cutting operation. In simulating the first tooth, Response Surface Method is used to select the desired controllable parameters of the process such as cutting speed, rake angle, clearance angle, rise per tooth and depth of cut. In order to establish low thermal and high mechanical load in workpiece, multi-objective genetic algorithm employed after perform simulation in the first tooth. In simulating the second tooth, Response Surface Method used to select desired controllable parameters of the process such as rake angle, clearance angle and radius of cutting edge. For the second tooth, a multi-objective genetic algorithm has been used. Ultimately, the geometry of the broaching tool utility has been designed to store the lowest tensile residual stresses in the machined surface for Ti6Al4V alloy.


1. Davim, J.P., Machining: fundamentals and recent advances,
Springer Science & Business Media, (2008). 
2. Liu, C.R. and Guo, Y. B., “Finite element analysis of the effect
of sequential cuts and tool–chip friction on residual stresses in a
machined layer”, International Journal of Mechanical 
Sciences, Vol. 42, No. 6, (2000), 1069–1086. 
3. Mo, S.P., Axinte, D.A., Hyde, T.H. and Gindy, N. N. Z., “An 
example of selection of the cutting conditions in broaching of
heat-resistant alloys based on cutting forces, surface roughness
and tool wear”, Journal of materials processing technology,
Vol. 160, No. 3, (2005), 382–389.  
4. Makarov, V.F., Tokarev, D.I. and Tyktamishev, V. R., “High
speed broaching of hard machining materials.”, International
Journal of Material Forming, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2008), 547–550.  
5. Schulze, V., Osterried, J. and Strauß, T., “FE analysis on the
influence of sequential cuts on component conditions for
different machining strategies”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 19,
(2011), 318–323.  
6. Kong, X., Li, B., Jin, Z. and Geng, W., “Broaching performance
of superalloy GH4169 based on FEM”, Journal of Materials
Science & Technology, Vol. 27, No. 12, (2011), 1178–1184.  
7. Zhang, Y.L. and Chen, W.Y., “Finite Element Modeling of the
Broaching Process of Inconel718”, In Materials Science Forum
(Vol. 697), Trans Tech Publications Ltd., (2012), 39–43.  
8. Kishawy, H.A., Hosseini, A., Moetakef-Imani, B. and Astakhov,
V. P., “An energy based analysis of broaching operation: Cutting
forces and resultant surface integrity”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 61,
No. 1, (2012), 107–110.  
9. Sarwar, M., Dinsdale, M. and Haider, J., “Development of
advanced broaching tool for machining titanium alloy”, In
Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 445), Trans Tech
Publications Ltd., (2012), 161–166.  
10. Jafarian, F., Amirabadi, H. and Sadri, J., “Experimental
measurement and optimization of tensile residual stress in
turning process of Inconel718 superalloy”, Measurement, Vol.
63, (2015), 1–10.  
11. Fabre, D., Bonnet, C., Rech, J. and Mabrouki, T., “Iterative
Lagrangian model of broaching to study cutting forces,
temperatures and chip formation.”, In AIP Conference
Proceedings (Vol. 1769, No. 1), AIP Publishing LLC., (2016),
12. Chandrashekar, M. and Prasadb, K. S., “Evaluation of Flank
Wear of Iron-rich Binder Carbide Cutting Tool in Turning of
Titanium Alloy”, International Journal of EngineeringTransactions

13. Ortiz-de-Zarate, G., Sela, A., Ducobu, F., Saez-de-Buruaga, M.,
Soler, D., Childs, T.H.C. and Arrazola, P. J., “Evaluation of
different flow stress laws coupled with a physical based ductile
failure criterion for the modelling of the chip formation process
of Ti-6Al-4V under broaching conditions”, Procedia CIRP, Vol.
82, (2019), 65–70.  
14. Theoretical Manual, DEFORM-2D-10®, (2010).
15. Ezugwu, E.O. and Wang, Z. M., “Titanium alloys and their 
machinability—a review”, Journal of Materials Processing
Technology, Vol. 68, No. 3, (1997), 262–274.  
16. Özel, T. and Ulutan, D., “Prediction of machining induced
residual stresses in turning of titanium and nickel based alloys
with experiments and finite element simulations”, CIRP Annals,
Vol. 61, No. 1, (2012), 547–550.  
17. Filice, L., Micari, F., Rizzuti, S. and Umbrello, D., “A critical
analysis on the friction modelling in orthogonal machining”,
International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture,
Vol. 47, No. 3–4, (2007), 709–714.  
18. Umbrello, D., “Finite element simulation of conventional and
high speed machining of Ti6Al4V alloy”, Journal of Materials
Processing Technology, Vol. 196, No. 1–3, (2008), 79–87.  
19. Srinivas, N. and Deb, K., “Muiltiobjective optimization using
nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms”, Evolutionary
Computation, Vol. 2, No. 3, (1994), 221–248.