The Effect of Soil Type on Seismic Response of Tall Telecommunication Towers with Random Vibration Analysis

Document Type : Original Article


Civil Engineering Department, Ardabil branch, Islamic Azad Unicersity, Ardabil, Iran


Random vibration analysis of tall structures faces multiple problems due to the large number of elements and high degrees of freedom; that is why this type of analysis is mostly used in simple structures and low degrees of freedom. In the past two decades, changes have been occurred in this type of analysis to be used in complex structures and the large number of elements. Pseudo-Excitation Method (PEM) presents a simple formulation for reducing the volume of operations. In this paper, a tall telecommunication tower is fully modeled as an example of such towers; it is analyzed by random vibration analysis with the help of the above method. Different conditions of the soil under the tower and different damping are used in modeling and analysis. The results show that structure response is strongly influenced by the soil conditions. In addition, higher modes have significant effects on the telecommunication tower response


1. Wijker, J. J., “Random Vibrations in Spacecraft Structures
Design: Theory and Applications”, Springer, (2009). 
2. Euro Code 8, “European committee for standardization,
structures in seismic regions-design part 2: bridge”, Brussels,
3. Lin, J. H., “A fast CQC algorithm of PSD matrices for seismic
responses”, Computers and Structures, Vol. 44, No. 3, (1992),
4. Lin, J. H., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y. H., “Accurate and highly
efficient algorithms for structural stationary/non-stationary
random responses”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics
and Engineering, Vol. 191, No. 1–2, (2001),103–111. 
5. Lin, J. H.,  Zhang, W. S., Li, J. J., “Structural responses to
arbitrarily coherent stationary random excitations”, Computers
and Structure, Vol. 50, No. 5, (1994), 629–633. 
6. Lin, J. H., Li, J. J., Zhang, W. S., Williams, F. W., “Nonstationary
random seismic response of multi-support structures
in evolutionary inhomogeneous random fields”, Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 26, (1997), 135145.
7. Li, Q. S., Zhang, Y. H., Wu, J. R., Lin, J. H., “Seismic random
vibration analysis of tall buildings”, Engineering Structures,
Vol. 26, (2004), 1767-1778. 
8. Zhang, Y. H., Li, Q. S., Lin, J. H., Williams, F. W, “Random
vibration analysis of long-span structures subjected to spatially
varying ground motions”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering, Vol. 29, (2009), 620-629. 
9. Zhang, D. Y., Li, X., Yan, W. M., Xie, W. C., Pandey, M. D.,
“Stochastic seismic analysis of a concretefilled steel tubular
(CFST) arch bridge under tridirectional multiple excitations”,
Engineering Structures, Vol. 52, (2013) 355–371. 
10. Zeng, Z. P., Yu, Z. W., Zhao, Y. G., Xu, W. T., Chen, L. K,
Lou, P., “Numerical simulation of vertical random vibration of
Train-slab Track-bridge intersection system by PEM”, Shock
and Vibration, Article ID 304219,(2014), 21 pages. 
11. Zhao, B., Wang, Y., Chen, Z., Shi, Y., Jiang, Y., Wang, Y.,
“Research on the random seismic response analysis for multiand
large-span structures to multi-support excitations”,
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 14,
(2015), 527-538. 
12. Lin, Z., Pei, S., Li, X., Qiang, S., “Probabilistic evaluation
approach for nonlinear vehicle-bridge dynamic performances”,
Journal of Sound Vibration, Vol. 339, (2015), 143-156. 
13. Zhang, W., Liu, H., Gao, T., “Topology optimization of largescale
structures subjected to stationary random excitation: An
efficient optimization procedure integrating pseudo excitation
method and mode acceleration method”, Computers and
Structures, Vol. 158, (2015), 61-70. 
14. Huang, D. M., Zhu, L. D., Chen, W., “Covariance proper
transformation-based pseudo excitation algorithm and simplified
SRSS method for the response of high-rise building subject to
wind-induced multi-excitation”,  Engineering Structures, Vol.
100, (2015), 425-441. 
15. Fei, H. E., Hongqiang, L., Jihong, Z., Zhongze, G., “Structural
topology optimization under stationary random base acceleration
excitations”, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 32, No. 6,
(2019), 1416-1427. 
16. Yahyai, M., Rezayibana, B., Saedi Daryan, A., “Nonlinear
seismic response of Milad tower using finite element model”,
Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 18, No.
8, (2009), 877 – 890. 
17. ABAQUS, ABAQUS Theory Manual and Users’ Manual
Version 6.14, (2016). 
18. Clough, R. W., Penzien, J., “Dynamics of Structures”, McGraw
Hill, New York, (1993). 
19. Der Kiureghian , A., Neuenhofer, A., “Response spectrum
method for multi- support seismic excitations”, Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 8, (1992)
20. Dumanoglu, A. A., Soyluk, K., “A stochastic analysis of long
span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions
including the site-response effect”, Engineering Structures,
Vol. 25, No. 10, (2003), 1301–1310. 
21. Amiri, M. M., Yahyai, M., “Estimation of damping ratio of TV
towers based on ambient vibration monitoring”,  Structural
Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 22, No. 11, (2013),