Evaluation of Seismic Response of Concrete Structures Reinforced by Shape Memory Alloys (Technical Note)

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Birjand University of Technology, Birjand, Iran


Shape memory alloys (SMAs) are unique smart materials that have many advantages, such as ability to resist large strains without leaving residual strains and ability to recover original form. However, the high costs of SMAs have limited their usage. This paper evaluates the behavior of concrete structures equipped with SMAs in an optimal manner as they are being used along the plastic hinge of the beams. For this purpose, a reinforced concrete (RC) beam, a 2D RC frame and a 3D RC building are considered, which were tested in previous studies under cyclic loading and on a shaking table. After verifying RC beam in the Seismostruct software, the steel rebars are replaced by SMAs in all connections of models and time history analysis is performed. The seismic response of concrete structures equipped with SMAs is compared with the conventional RC structures. The maximum base shear and roof displacement, amount of residual displacement and distribution of interstory drift at the structure height are among the factors to be evaluated. The results show that, due to the use of SMAs in concrete structures, the maximum base shear does not significantly change compared with the conventional RC structures, and the residual displacements in the structure roof have been reduced. On the other hand, the maximum displacement of the roof was increased in the structures with SMAs. The concrete structures equipped with SMAs experience a slight residual deformation, and the distribution of interstory drift is even more uniform at the height of such structures.


1.  Ho, J. C. M., Lam, J. Y. K., and Kwan, A. K. H., “Effectiveness
of adding confinement for ductility improvement of high-strength
concrete columns”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 32, No. 3,
(2010), 714–725. 
2.  Comartin, C. D., Greene, M., and Tubbesing, S. K., “TheHyogoken Nanbu Earthquake: Great Hanshin EarthquakeDisaster”, Preliminary Reconnaissance Report, (1995). 
3.  Kianoush, M. and Esfahani, M. R., “Axial Compressive Strengthof Reinforced Concrete Columns Wrapped with Fiber ReinforcedPolymers (FRP).”, International Journal of Engineering,
Transactions B: Applications, Vol. 18, No. 1, (2005), 9–19. 
4.  Bagheri, M., Chahkandi, A., and Jahangir, H., “SeismicReliability Analysis of RC Frames Rehabilitated by Glass FiberReinforced
Polymers”, International Journal of CivilEngineering, Vol. 17, No. 11, (2019), 1785–1797. 
5.  Jahangir, H. and Esfahani, M. R., “Numerical Study of Bond –Slip Mechanism in Advanced Externally Bonded StrengtheningComposites”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 22, No.11, (2018), 4509–4518. 
6.  Santandrea, M., Imohamed, I. A. O., Jahangir, H., Carloni, C.,Mazzotti, C., De Miranda, S., Ubertini, F., and Casadei, P., “Aninvestigation of the debonding mechanism in steel FRP- andFRCM-concrete joints”, In 4th Workshop on the new boundariesof structural concrete, (2016), 289–298. 
7.  Jahangir, H. and Esfahani, M., “Strain of newly – developedcomposites relationship in flexural tests”, Journal of Structuraland Construction Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 3, (2018), 92–107. 
8.  Asgarian, B. and Moradi, S., “Seismic response of steel bracedframes with shape memory alloy braces”, Journal ofConstructional Steel Research, Vol. 67, No. 1, (2011), 65–74. 
9.  Dolce, M., Cardone, D., and Ponzo, F. C., “Shaking-table tests onreinforced concrete frames with different isolation systems”,Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 36, No.5, (2007), 573–596. 
10.  Qian, H., Li, H., and Song, G., “Experimental investigations ofbuilding structure with a superelastic shape memory alloy frictiondamper subject to seismic loads”, Smart Materials andStructures, Vol. 25, No. 12, (2016), 125026-125040. 
11.  Dutta, S. C. and Majumder, R., “Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) asa Potential Damper in Structural Vibration Control”, In Advancesin Manufacturing Engineering and Materials, (2019), 485–492. 
12.  Saiidi, M. S. and Wang, H., “Exploratory study of seismicresponse of concrete columns with shape memory alloysreinforcement”, ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 103, No. 3, (2006),436–443. 
13.  Youssef, M. A., Alam, M. S., and Nehdi, M., “ExperimentalInvestigation on the Seismic Behavior of Beam-Column JointsReinforced with Superelastic Shape Memory Alloys”, Journal ofEarthquake Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 7, (2008), 1205–1222. 
14.  Abdulridha, A., Palermo, D., Foo, S., and Vecchio, F. J.,“Behavior and modeling of superelastic shape memory alloyreinforced concrete beams”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 49,(2013), 893–904. 
15.  Malagisi, S., Marfia, S., Sacco, E., and Toti, J., “Modeling ofsmart concrete beams with shape memory alloy actuators”,Engineering Structures, Vol. 75, (2014), 63–72. 
16.  Moon, D. Y., Roh, H., and Cimellaro, G. P., “SeismicPerformance of Segmental Rocking Columns Connected withNiTi Martensitic SMA Bars”, Advances in StructuralEngineering, Vol. 18, No. 4, (2015), 571–584. 
17.  Shahverdi, M., Michels, J., Czaderski, C., and Motavalli, M.,“Iron-based shape memory alloy strips for strengthening RCmembers: Material behavior and characterization”, Constructionand Building Materials, Vol. 173, (2018), 586–599. 
18.  Gao, N., Jeon, J.-S., Hodgson, D. E., and DesRoches, R., “Aninnovative seismic bracing system based on a superelastic shapememory alloy ring”, Smart Materials and Structures, Vol. 25,No. 5, (2016), 055030–055046. 
19.  Qiu, C. and Du, X., “Seismic performance of multistory CBFswith novel recentering energy dissipative braces”, Journal ofConstructional Steel Research, (2019), 105864.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105864. 
20.  Jalali, A., Cardone, D., and Narjabadifam, P., “Smart restorable
sliding base isolation system”, Bulletin of Earthquake
Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 2, (2011), 657–673. 
21.  Mishra, S. K., Gur, S., Roy, K., and Chakraborty, S., “Response
of Bridges Isolated by Shape Memory–Alloy Rubber Bearing”,
Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, (2016),
22.  Hedayati Dezfuli, F. and Alam, M. S., “Smart Lead Rubber
Bearings Equipped with Ferrous Shape Memory Alloy Wires for
Seismically Isolating Highway Bridges”, Journal of Earthquake
Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 6, (2018), 1042–1067. 
23.  Sayyaadi, H. and Zakerzadeh, M. R., “Nonlinear Analysis of a
Flexible Beam Actuated by a Couple of Active SMA Wire
Actuators”, International Journal of Engineering, Transactions
C: Aspects, Vol. 25, No. 3, (2012), 249–264. 
24.  Mir Mohammad Sadeghi, S. A., Hoseini, S. F., Fathi, A., and
Mohammadi Daniali, H., “Experimental Hysteresis Identification
and Micro-position Control of a Shape-Memory-Alloy Rod
Actuator”, International Journal of Engineering, Transactions
A: Basics, Vol. 32, No. 1, (2019), 71–77. 
25.  Alam, M. S., Youssef, M. A., and Nehdi, M., “Analytical
prediction of the seismic behaviour of superelastic shape memory
alloy reinforced concrete elements”, Engineering Structures,
Vol. 30, No. 12, (2008), 3399–3411. 
26.  Alam, M. S., Youssef, M. A., and Nehdi, M. L., “Exploratory
investigation on mechanical anchors for connecting SMA bars to
steel or FRP bars”, Materials and Structures, Vol. 43, No. 1,
(2010), 91–107. 
27.  Muntasir Billah, A. H. M. and Shahria Alam, M., “Seismic
performance of concrete columns reinforced with hybrid shape
memory alloy (SMA) and fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bars”,
Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 28, No. 1, (2012),
28. DesRoches, R., McCormick, J., and Delemont, M., “Cyclic
Properties of Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy Wires and Bars”,
Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 1, (2004), 38–
29.  Malécot, P., Lexcellent, C., Folte^te, E., and Collet, M., “Shape
Memory Alloys Cyclic Behavior: Experimental Study and
Modeling”, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology,
Vol 128, No. 3, (2006), 335–345. 
30.  Auricchio, F. and Sacco, E., “A Superelastic Shape-MemoryAlloy
Beam Model”, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems
and Structures, Vol. 8, No. 6, (1997), 489–501. 
31.  Seismosoft, “SeismoStruct v7.0 - A computer program for static
and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures”, Pavia,
Italy. Seismic Support Service, (2014). 
32.  Pareek, S., Suzuki, Y., Araki, Y., Youssef, M. A., and Meshaly,
M., “Plastic hinge relocation in reinforced concrete beams using
Cu-Al-Mn SMA bars”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 175,
(2018), 765–775. 
33.  Zendaoui, A., Kadid, A., and Yahiaoui, D., “Comparison of
Different Numerical Models of RC Elements for Predicting the
Seismic Performance of Structures”, International Journal of
Concrete Structures and Materials, Vol. 10, No 4, (2016), 461–
34.  Negro, P. and Mola, E., “A performance based approach for the
seismic assessment and rehabilitation of existing RC buildings”,
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 8, (2017),
35.  Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R., “Theoretical
Stress‐Strain Model for Confined Concrete”, Journal of
Structural Engineering, Vol 114, No. 8, (1988), 1804–1826. 
36.  Paulay, T. and Priestley, M. J. N., “Seismic Design of Reinforced
Concrete and Masonry Buildings”, Wiley – Interscience, (1992).