Probabilistic Approach to the Seismic Vulnerability of RC Frame Structures by the Development of Analytical Fragility Curves

Authors

1 Laboratory of Civil Engineering and Hydraulics, University of Guelma, Algeria

2 Mechanical Engineering Technology Department at City Tech, New York, USA

Abstract

Fragility curves are very useful in quantifying the physical and economic damage of buildings that have undergone an earthquake. This paper presents the development of analytical fragility curves representative of mid-rise residential structures built with reinforced concrete, taking into account the specific structural characteristics of Algerian buildings. The derivation of the analytical fragility curves is based on the capacity spectrum method (CSM), which combines a non-linear static analysis (pushover) with a response spectrum analysis. Observation of the consequences of earthquakes of a given intensity shows that the damage to buildings is not identical, even though their construction is similar. This variability of damage can be explained by the variability of a large number of factors such as the local intensity of the hazard, the heterogeneity of the terrain, and the mechanical and geometrical characteristics of the constructions. The materials and patterns of demand spectra were considered as random variables using the Latin Hypercube Sampling Technique. Most of the existing methods that model the damage to structures accept a log-normal distribution hypothesis, where the log-normal law is a model controlled by two parameters: its mean value and its standard deviation. To set these parameters, Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) are performed to generate 1000 samples. The resulting fragility curves following these analyses were applied to two real-life cases of buildings affected by the earthquake of Beni-Ilmane 2010 (Msila, Algeria), so as to assess the damage.

Keywords


1.     DTR, B., 2 48 regles parasismiques algeriennes. (2003), RPA 99/Version.

2.     Davidovici, V., "Rapport preliminaire seisme de boumerdes 21 mai 2003", Alger, Juin,  (2003).

3.     Dang, C.-T., "Methodes de construction des courbes de fragilite sismique par simulations numeriques", Universite Blaise Pascal-Clermont-Ferrand II,  (2014),

4.     Singhal, A. and Kiremidjian, A.S., "Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage", Journal of Structural Engineering,  Vol. 122, No. 12, (1996), 1459-1467.

5.     D’ayala, D.F., "Force and displacement based vulnerability assessment for traditional buildings", Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,  Vol. 3, No. 3, (2005), 235-265.

6.     Rossetto, T. and Elnashai, A., "A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of rc structures", Engineering Structures,  Vol. 27, No. 3, (2005), 397-409.

7.     Borzi, B., Pinho, R. and Crowley, H., "Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large-scale assessment of rc buildings", Engineering Structures,  Vol. 30, No. 3, (2008), 804-820.

8.     Rezaiee-Pajand, M., Bambaeechee, M. and Sarafrazi, S., "Static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of steel frame with semi-rigid connections", International Journal of Engineering-Transactions A: Basics,  Vol. 24, No. 3, (2011), 203.

9.     Yazdani, A., Razmyan, S. and Hossainabadi, H.B., "Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using reduction of ground motion records", International Journal of Engineering-Transactions B: Applications,  Vol. 28, No. 2, (2014), 190.

10.   Freeman, S., "Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk-a case study of puget sound naval shipyard", in Proc. 1st US Nat. Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Bremerton, Washington, 1975., (1975), 113-122.

11.   ATC, A., "40, seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings", Applied Technology Council, report ATC-40. Redwood City,  (1996).

12.   Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M., "N2-a method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular buildings", in Proceedings of the ninth world conference in earthquake engineering. Vol. 5, (1988), 111-116.

13.   Standard, E.B.C., "Design of structures for earthquake resistance", Ministry of Works and Urban Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,  (1995).

14.   Mouroux, P. and Negulescu, C., "Comparaison pratique entre les méthodes en deplacement de l’atc 40 (en amortissement) et de l’eurocode 8 (en ductilite), 7eme Colloque National AFPS., (2007).

15.   Mander, J.B. and Basoz, N., "Seismic fragility curve theory for highway bridges", in Optimizing post-earthquake lifeline system reliability, ASCE., (1999), 31-40.

16.   Siqueira, G.H., "Evaluation de la vulnerabilite sismique des ponts routiers au quebec rehabilites avec l'utilisation d'isolateurs en caoutchouc naturel", Citeseer,  (2013),

17.   Tariverdilo, S., Farjadi, A. and Barkhordary, M., "Fragility curves for reinforced concrete frames with lap-spliced columns", International Journal of Engineering-Transactions A: Basics,  Vol. 22, No. 3, (2009), 213-220.

18.   Council, B.S.S., "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", Report FEMA-356, Washington, DC,  (2000).

19.   FEMA, H.-M., "Mr3 technical manual", Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology Earthquake Model,  (2003).

20.   Vacareanu, R., Lungu, D., Aldea, A. and Arion, C., An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different european towns, report wp7: Seismic risk scenarios handbook. European commission, brussels. (2004).

21.   Ruiz‐García, J. and Miranda, E., "Probabilistic estimation of maximum inelastic displacement demands for performance‐based design", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,  Vol. 36, No. 9, (2007), 1235-1254.

22.   McKay, M.D., Beckman, R.J. and Conover, W.J., "Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code", Technometrics,  Vol. 21, No. 2, (1979), 239-245.

23.   Rubinstein, R.Y. and Kroese, D.P., "Simulation and the monte carlo method, John Wiley & Sons,  Vol. 10,  (2016).

24.   Popescu, D.E., Popescu, C. and Gabor, G., "Monte carlo simulation using excel for predicting reliability of a geothermal plant", in Int. Geothermal Conf., (2003), 7-12.