Method for Assessing Damage to Gas Distribution Network Pipelines based on Nonlinear Guided Wave

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Petroleum Engineering, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st line, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

Abstract

Polyethylene pipeline is an essential infrastructure of gas distribution network, and there are some problems such as complex damage assessment and tedious assessment process. How to choose an effective damage assessment method for polyethylene pipelines is the focus of the implementation of the gas distribution network at present. In this paper, a nonlinear directional wave method is proposed to detect the damage of polyethylene pipeline by an acoustic wave, and the damage results of polyethylene pipeline are searched. The rationality of this method is verified by calculating the aerodynamic equation.The results show that the nonlinear fixed wave method can accurately determine the damage and crack propagation degree of the pipeline and simplify the damage assessment process, and the results are superior to the linear directional wave method. Therefore, the nonlinear directional wave can be used to assess the damage to ethylene pipelines in gas distribution networks, which has strong rationality and practicality and provides support for the actual pipeline damage assessment.

Graphical Abstract

Method for Assessing Damage to Gas Distribution Network Pipelines based on Nonlinear Guided Wave

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Guo Z, Xu R, Xue P. Study on preparation of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene pipe of good thermal-mechanical properties modified with organo-montmorillonite by screw extrusion. Materials. 2020;13(15):3342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13153342 
  2. Nikolaev A, Samigullin G, Samigullina L, Fetisov V, editors. Non-stationary operation of gas pipeline based on selections of travel. IOP conference series: Materials Science and Engineering; 2018: IOP Publishing.
  3. Istrate I-R, Juan R, Martin-Gamboa M, Domínguez C, García-Muñoz RA, Dufour J. Environmental life cycle assessment of the incorporation of recycled high-density polyethylene to polyethylene pipe grade resins. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;319:128580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128580 
  4. Wee J-W, Park S-Y, Choi B-H. Modeling and application of discontinuous slow crack growth behaviors of high-density polyethylene pipe with various geometries and loading conditions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2020;236:107205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107205
  5. Patadia H, Lively K, Lamborn M, Maeger P, Sukhadia A. Rapid crack propagation (RCP) performance of unimodal medium density polyethylene (MDPE) pipe. Plastics Engineering. 2013;69(5):12-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107205 
  6. Deblieck RA, van Beek D, McCarthy M, Mindermann P, Remerie K, Langer B, et al. A simple intrinsic measure for rapid crack propagation in bimodal polyethylene pipe grades validated by elastic–plastic fracture mechanics analysis of data from instrumented Charpy impact test. Polymer Engineering & Science. 2017;57(1):13-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1941-9635.2013.tb01002.x 
  7. Fetisov V, Ilyushin YV, Vasiliev GG, Leonovich IA, Müller J, Riazi M, et al. Development of the automated temperature control system of the main gas pipeline. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):3092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29570-4
  8. Fedorov YY, Popov S, Savvina A, Vasilyev S, Rodionov A, editors. A simplified method to determine resistance to rapid crack propagation in polyethylene pipes. AIP Conference Proceedings; 2017: AIP Publishing.
  9. Gafur S, Andrey S, Liliya S, Vadim F. Assessment of damage of metallic elements in oil and gas facilities using small punch test. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 2017;12(21):11583-7. https://www.ripublication.com/ijaer17/ijaerv12n21_148.pdf
  10. Yayla P, Leevers P. Rapid crack propagation in pressurised plastic pipe—II. Critical pressures for polyethylene pipe. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 1992;42(4):675-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(92)90049-K
  11. Sajid T, Tanveer S, Sabir Z, Guirao J. Impact of activation energy and temperature-dependent heat source/sink on Maxwell–Sutterby fluid. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2020;2020:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5251804 
  12. Bo Y, Yijiang L, Maodong L, Wei Z, Wenbo L, Zhigang W. Research progress in cyclic crack round bar test for polyethylene pipes. China Plastics. 2019;33(10):128. 10.5829/ije.2023.36.12c.14
  13. Guirao JL, Sabir Z, Saeed T. Design and numerical solutions of a novel third-order nonlinear Emden–Fowler delay differential model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2020;2020:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7359242
  14. Baratian A, Kashani H. Probabilistic framework to quantify the seismic resilience of natural gas distribution networks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022;81:103282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103282
  15. Fetisov V, Shalygin AV, Modestova SA, Tyan VK, Shao C. Development of a numerical method for calculating a gas supply system during a period of change in thermal loads. Energies. 2022;16(1):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010060
  16. Bukka SR, Law YZ, Santo H, Chan ES. Reduced order model for nonlinear multi-directional ocean wave propagation. Physics of Fluids. 2021;33(11). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0070246
  17. Cavana M, Leone P. Smart Gas Network with Linepack Managing to Increase Biomethane Injection at the Distribution Level. Energies. 2022;15(21):8198. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218198
  18. Chen Y, Zhang L, Wei X, Xu J, Fu S, Liao C. Debris-flow-induced damage assessment for a submarine pipeline network in regional-scale natural terrain. Engineering Geology. 2022;311:106917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106917
  19. Cui Y, Fang J, Qu Z, Song M, Zhao J. Research on Damage Assessment of Buried Standard and Carbon-Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Petroleum Pipeline Subjected to Shallow Buried Blast Loading in Soil. Shock and Vibration. 2021;2021:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1459260
  20. Nikolaev A, Dokoukin V, Lykov Y, Fetisov V, editors. Research of processes of heat exchange in horizontal pipeline. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; 2018: IOP Publishing.
  21. Guzzo G, Cheli L, Carcasci C. Hydrogen blending in the Italian scenario: Effects on a real distribution network considering natural gas origin. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;379:134682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134682
  22. Hosseini-Toudeshky H, Jannnesari M. An investigation on creep life assessment of welded steam pipeline intersection using classical and progressive damage analyses. Welding in the World. 2022;66(8):1653-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-022-01324-2
  23. Hu Y, Liu J, Xu X. Dynamic Interactions between Local Energy Systems Coupled by Power and Gas Distribution Networks. Energies. 2022;15(22):8420. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228420
  24. Fetisov V, Davardoost H, Mogylevets V. Technological aspects of methane–hydrogen mixture transportation through operating gas pipelines considering industrial and fire safety. Fire. 2023;6(10):409. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6100409
  25. Kim I-J, Kim C-M, Baek J-H, Kim Y-P, Lee Y, Jang Y-C. Structural Integrity Assessment of Defected Gas Pipelines Using a Simplified Ductile Damage Model. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. 2022;144(1):011302. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050775
  26. Zadkov D, Gabov V, Babyr N, Stebnev A, Teremetskaya V. Adaptable and energy-efficient powered roof support unit. Min Informational Anal Bull. 2022;6:46-61. https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2022_6_0_46
  27. Kimmoun O, Hsu H-C, Hoffmann N, Chabchoub A. Experiments on uni-directional and nonlinear wave group shoaling. Ocean Dynamics. 2021;71:1105-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-021-01485-6
  28. Klahn M, Madsen PA, Fuhrman DR. Mean and variance of the Eulerian and Lagrangian horizontal velocities induced by nonlinear multi-directional irregular water waves. Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 2021;477(2256):20210516. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2021.0516
  29. Schipachev A, Fetisov V, Nazyrov A, Khamrakulov A. Study of the pipeline in emergency operation and assessing the magnitude of the gas leak. Energies. 2022;15(14):5294. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15145294
  30. Cui Y, Quddus N, Mashuga CV. Bayesian network and game theory risk assessment model for third-party damage to oil and gas pipelines. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2020;134:178-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.038
  31. Fetisov V, Tcvetkov P, Müller J. Tariff approach to regulation of the European gas transportation system: Case of Nord Stream. Energy Reports. 2021;7:413-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.08.023
  32. Bouziou D, Van Ballegooy S, Storie L, O’Rourke T. Development of pipeline damage assessment tools using liquefaction-induced ground movements and CPT-based liquefaction metrics. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions: CRC Press; 2019. p. 1527-36.
  33. Litvinenko V, Bowbriсk I, Naumov I, Zaitseva Z. Global guidelines and requirements for professional competencies of natural resource extraction engineers: Implications for ESG principles and sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;338:130530. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130530
  34. Stroykov G, Babyr N, Ilin I, Marchenko R. System of Comprehensive Assessment of Project Risks in the Energy Industry. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics, . 2021;34(7):1778-84. 10.5829/IJE.2021.34.07A.22
  35. Aazami R, Dabestani S, Shirkhani M. Optimal Capacity and Location for Renewable-based Microgrids Considering Economic Planning in Distribution Networks. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions C: Aspects,. 2023;36(12):2175-83. 10.5829/ije.2023.36.12c.06
  36. Aleksander G P, Yifan T, Fuming Z. Predicting Service Life of Polyethylene Pipes under Crack Expansion using. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions C: Aspects, . 2023;36(12):2243-52. 10.5829/ije.2023.36.12c.14
  37. Shammazov I, Karyakina E. The LNG Flow Simulation in Stationary Conditions through a Pipeline with Various Types of Insulating Coating. Fluids. 2023;8(2):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids8020068
  38. Zemenkova MY, Chizhevskaya EL, Zemenkov YD. Intelligent monitoring of the condition of hydrocarbon pipeline transport facilities using neural network technologies. Записки Горного института. 2022;258:933-44. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2022.105
  39. Baktizin RN, Zaripov RM, Korobkov GE, Masalimov RB. Assessment of internal pressure effect, causing additional bending of the pipeline. Записки Горного института. 2020;242:160-8. https://doi.org/10.31897/pmi.2020.2.160
  40. Vasiliev GG, Dzhaljabov AА, Leonovich IА. Analysis of the causes of engineering structures deformations at gas industry facilities in the permafrost zone. Записки Горного института. 2021;249:377-85. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2021.3.6
  41. Ustinov D, Nazarychev A, Pelenev D, Babyr K, Pugachev A. Investigation of the Effect of Current Protections in Conditions of Single-Phase Ground Fault through Transient Resistance in the Electrical Networks of Mining Enterprises. Energies. 2023;16(9):3690. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093690
  42. Nguyen VT, Pham TV, Rogachev MK, Korobov GY, Parfenov DV, Zhurkevich AO, et al. A comprehensive method for determining the dewaxing interval period in gas lift wells. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. 2023;13(4):1163-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-022-01598-8
  43. Afanaseva O, Bezyukov O, Pervukhin D, Tukeev D. Experimental Study Results Processing Method for the Marine Diesel Engines Vibration Activity Caused by the Cylinder-Piston Group Operations. Inventions. 2023;8(3):71. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions8030071
  44. Islamov S, Bondarenko A, Gabibov A, Mardashov D. Polymer compositions for well killing operation in fractured reservoirs. Advances in raw material industries for sustainable development goals. 2021:343-51. 10.1201/9781003164395-43
  45. Islamov S, Bondarenko A, Mardashov D. A selection of emulsifiers for preparation of invert emulsion drilling. Topical Issues of Rational Use of Natural Resources, Volume 2. 2019:487. 10.1201/9781003014638-2
International Journal of Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 5
TRANSACTIONS B: Applications
May 2024
Pages 852-859

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics