Optimization of Control System of Petroleum Refinery Isomerization Unit by Plant-Wide Control Principles

Document Type : Original Article


Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Arak, Iran


Industrial process control system due to integration of equipment, existing material and energy recycle streams and their effects are extraordinary importance. The process in terms of safety, product quality and control stability have a challenge when there was defects in a process control system. The isomerization process is gaining importance in the presence of refining context due to upgrading the octane number of light naphtha fractions and also simultaneously reduces aromatic compounds especially benzene content. In this study, the isomerization unit control system of Imam Khomeini Oil Refinery Company (IKORC, shazand, Iran), by defined four controllers include: the temperature controller on pre-heater exchanger, the concentration controller on depentanizer, deisopentanizer and deisohexanizer towers. This work is based on the nine principles of the plant-wide process control, was investigated. It should be noted that currently lack these four controllers in isomerization unit, confront this unit to challenge in dealing with sudden disturbances. The results show that obtained data from dynamic simulation by Aspen Hysys v7.3 had an acceptable compliance with the principles of plant-wide process control theory.


1. Hancsok, J., Magyar, S., Szoboszlai, Z. and Kallo, D.,
“Investigation of energy and feedstock saving production of
gasoline blending components free of benzene”, Fuel Processing Technology, Vol. 88, No. 4, (2007), 393-399.
2. Newalkar, B.L., Net t em, V.C. and Siddiqui, M.A.,
“Hydroisomerization catalysts: Chemistry and its features.
Catalysts in Hydrocarbon Processing & Fertilizer Industry”,
P et rot ech Societ y, New Delhi, India, (2005).
3. Askari, A., Karimi, H., Rah imi, M.R. and Ghanbari, M.,
“Simulation and modeling of catalytic reforming process”,
Petroleum & Coal journal, Vol. 54, No. 1, (2012), 76 –84.
4. Rahimpour, M.R., Jafari, M. and Iranshahi, D., “Progress in
cat alytic naphtha reforming process: A review”, Applied Energy, Vol. 109, (2013), 79–93.
5. Weyda, H. and Kohler, E., “Modern refining concepts: An update
on naphtha isomerization to modern gasoline manufacture”,
Catalysis Today, Vol. 81, No. 1, (2003), 51 -55.
6. Rangaiah, G.P . and Kariwala, V., “Plant-wide Control: Recent Developments and Applications”, Wiley Interscience, (2012).
7. Buckley, P.S., “Techniques of process control”, John Wiley &
Sons Lt d, New York, USA, (1965).
8. Foss, A.S., “Critique of chemical process control theory”, AIChE Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, (1973), 209 -214.
9. Findeisen, W., Bailey, F.N., Brdys, M., Malinowski, K.,
Tatjewski, P. and Wozniak, A., “Control and coordination in
Hierarchical Systems”, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York, USA,
10. Stephanopoulos, G., “Synthesis of control systems for chemical plants: A challenge for creativity”, Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 4, (1983), 331 –365.
11. Douglas, J.M., “Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes”, McGraw-Hill P ublishing Co, USA, (1988).
12. Balchen, J.G. and Mumme, K.I., “Process Control: Structures and applications”, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA, (1988).
13. Rijnsdorp, J.E., “Integrated Process Control and automation”, Elsevier, (1991).
14. Rinard, I.H. and Downs, J.J., “Plant-wide control: A review and critique”, AIChE Spring Meeting, New Orleans, USA, (1992).
15. Van De Wal, M. and De Jager, B., “Control structure design: A survey”, Proceedings of the American control conference, Seattle, USA, (1995).