Close Following Behavior: Estimation of Desired Gap Headway Using Loop Detector Data (TECHNICAL NOTE)


Roads and Transport Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq


The desired gap headway of drivers, while close following, represents the main parameter in determining the following distance between vehicles.  This paper uses the raw individual vehicles data taken from loop detectors for millions of vehicles used M25 and M42 in order to estimate the gap headway distributions between successive pairs of vehicles.  The data used in this paper were filtered so as to focus on the cases of close following behavior only and more than quarter million pairs of close following cases is used to presents the results.  Such huge sample size taken from loop detectors will increase the results reliability as previous research used limited sample size. The results presented the cumulative distribution of drivers’ gap headway and suggested that the mean gap headway of drivers is about 1.1 s with standard deviation of 0.42 s.   The lane choice found to be significantly influencing the desired gap headway for speed higher than 70km/h only. The effect of the follower vehicle type of the desired gap headway was also examined and the results suggested that such effect is insignificant.  The findings of this paper are suggested to be used as inputs for traffic micro-simulation models. 


1.P arker, M. T ., “The effect of heavy goods vehicles and following behavior on capacit y at mot orway roadwork sit es”,Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 37, No. 9, (1996), 524–531.
2.Sayer, J.R., Mefford, M.L., and Huang, R.,T he effect of lead vehicle size on driver following behavior: Is ignorance truly bliss? In P roceedings of t he2nd int ernational driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, t raining and vehicle design, 2003, Universit y of Iowa.
3.Brackst one, M., Waterson, B. and McDonald, M.,“Determinants of following dist ance in congest ed t raffic”,Transportation Research:F, 12(2), (2009), 131-142.
4.Rist o, M. and Mart ens, H. M., “Driver headway choice: A comparison bet ween driving simulat or and real-road driving”,Transportation Research: F,Vol.25. No. A, (2014), 1-9.
5.Depart ment for T ransport (DfT),“The official Highway Code”,(2018), UK.
6.Sumia, L. and Ranga, V.,“Intelligent Traffic management syst em for P riorit izing Emergency Vehicles in a Smart City”,International Journal of Engineering, TransactionB: Applications,Vol. 31, No. 2, (2018), 278-283
7.Abhigna, D., Ramees, M. and Ravishankar, K. V. R. “Effect of gap accept ance behavior of t he right turning vehicles on the major road st ream for uncontrolled t hree-legged int ersection under mixd traffic conditions”,International Journal of Engineering, Transaction B: Applications,Vol. 31, No. 6, (2018), 870-876.
8.Gipps, P .G.,“A behavioral car following model for computer simulat ion”,Transportation Research:B,Vol. 15, No. 2, (1986), 105-111.
9.Al-Obaedi, J. and Yousif, S., “Micro-simulation model for mot orway merges wit h ramp met ering cont rols”,IEEE transactions on Intelligent Transport Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, (2012), 296-306.
10.Johansson, G. and Rumer, K.,“Drivers’ brake reaction times”,Human Factors, Vol. 13, No. 1, (1971), 23-27.
11.Zhang, X. and Bham, G.H. (2007) Estimation of driver reaction t ime from det ailed vehicle t rajectory dat a, P roceeding of the 18th IAST ED Int ernat ional Conference, 574-579.
12.Yousif, S. and Al-Obaedi, J.,“Close following behavior: Testing visual angle car following models using various set s of data”,Transportation Research: F, Vol. 14, No. 2, (2011), 96-110.
13.Robert,T., Naujoks, F. and Neukum, A.,“The perceived criticality of different time headways is depending on velocity”,Transportation Research:F, Vol. 58, (2018), 1043-1052.
14.Rist o, M. and Martens, M. H., ”Time and space: The difference bet ween following t ime headway and dist ance headway instructions”,Transportation Research:F, Vol. 17,(2013), 45-51.
15.Badhrudeen, M, Ramesh, V. and Vanajakshi, L.,“Headway Analysis Using Aut omated Sensor Dat a under Indian T raffic Condit ions”,Transportation Research Procedia, Vol.17, (2016), 331-339.
16.Klein, D.P . and Bart on, M., “Safe road, reliable journeys and informed t ravelers”,Logistics & Transport Focus, Vol. 12, No. 1, (2010), 20-23.
17.Heydecker, B. G. and Addison, J. D., “Analysis and modelling of traffic flow under variable speed limits”,Transportation Research: C, Vol. 19, No. 2,(2011), 206-217.
18.Sult an B., McDonald M., "T he lane changing process: Data analysis and modeling behavior."Traffic Engineering and Control,Vol.43, No. 5,(2011),202-207.
19.Brackst one, M. and McDonald, M.,“Driver headway: How close is t oo close on a motorway,Ergonomics, Vol. 50, No. 8, (2007), 1183–1195