A Bi-objective Model of Research and Development in Battery Manufacturing Industry to Improve Customer Satisfaction

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Technology Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


Reviewing the efficiency of Research and Development (R&D) by giving an equal amount of importance to different R&D actions can make the measuring process too simple, which may cause an inaccurate interpretation of the R&D function and lead to an imprecise interpretation of R&D models. R&D comprises the creative work undertaken on a systematic basis to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of man, culture, and society, and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications. This research provides a two-phase approach to designing an R&D model in the auto battery manufacturing industry based on customer satisfaction. Due to the important role of R&D in customer satisfaction, no study has been conducted in this field and industry. In the first phase, the effective models for R&D management and the indices influencing customer satisfaction in R&D models are identified. In the second phase, the significance coefficients related to the customer satisfaction indices are obtained by using the fuzzy SWARA (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) as a multi-criteria decision-making method. Furthermore, each model’s importance and final priority are calculated by the fuzzy COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) method. Finally, to apply the proposed framework in the battery manufacturing industry, a bi-objective R&D model is presented. The coefficients obtained by the fuzzy COPRAS method are utilized as the input for the proposed model. Therefore, policy-makers and managers can perform their activities based on this method. The obtained results showed that the proposed framework is effective in the case under study.


Main Subjects

  1. Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J.S., Li, D. and Sampat, B.N., "Public r&d investments and private-sector patenting: Evidence from nih funding rules", The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 86, No. 1, (2019), 117-152. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdy034.
  2. Kayserili, A. and Kiyak, M., "Evaluation of r&d activities and the perspectives of the participants of pharmaceutical companies on r&d in turkey", Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Vol. 39, No. 2, (2019), 65-80. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1102229
  3. Carboni, O.A., "The effect of public support on investment and r&d: An empirical evaluation on european manufacturing firms", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 117, (2017), 282-295. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.017.
  4. Salimi, N. and Rezaei, J., "Evaluating firms’ r&d performance using best worst method", Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 66, (2018), 147-155. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.002.
  5. Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R. and Mari, L., "A model for r&d performance measurement", International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 134, No. 1, (2011), 212-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.018.
  6. Kerssens‐van Drongelen, I.c. and Bilderbeek, J., "R&d performance measurement: More than choosing a set of metrics", R&D Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, (1999), 35-46. doi: 10.1111/1467-9310.00115.
  7. Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P., Ciupagea, C., Smith, K., Tübke, A. and Tubbs, M., "Does europe perform too little corporate r&d? A comparison of eu and non-eu corporate r&d performance", Research Policy, Vol. 39, No. 4, (2010), 523-536. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.012.
  8. Tidd, J. and Bessant, J.R., "Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change, John Wiley & Sons, (2020).
  9. Griffin, A., "Pdma research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices", Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of The Product Development & Management Association, Vol. 14, No. 6, (1997), 429-458. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00061-1.
  10. Simao, L. and Franco, M., Understanding the influence of r&d collaboration on organizational innovation: Empirical evidences, in Disruptive technology: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. 2020, IGI Global.1983-2005.
  11. IAE, E., Innovation in batteries and electricity storage, a global analysis based on patent data. 2020, septembre.
  12. Lukach, R., Kort, P.M. and Plasmans, J., "Optimal r&d investment strategies under the threat of new technology entry", International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 25, No. 1, (2007), 103-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.02.002.
  13. Penan, H., "R & d strategy in a techno-economic network: Alzheimer's disease therapeutic strategies", Research Policy, Vol. 25, No. 3, (1996), 337-358. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00833-0.
  14. Aldieri, L., Sena, V. and Vinci, C.P., "Domestic r&d spillovers and absorptive capacity: Some evidence for us, europe and japan", International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 198, (2018), 38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.015.
  15. Lampert, C.M. and Kim, M., "Going far to go further: Offshoring, exploration, and r&d performance", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 103, (2019), doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.007.
  16. Steinberg, P.J., Procher, V.D. and Urbig, D., "Too much or too little of r&d offshoring: The impact of captive offshoring and contract offshoring on innovation performance", Research Policy, Vol. 46, No. 10, (2017), 1810-1823, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.008.
  17. Brady, M.K. and Cronin Jr, J.J., "Customer orientation: Effects on customer service perceptions and outcome behaviors", Journal of Service Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, (2001), 241-251. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00171-5.
  18. Ritu, S., Jatinder, K., Jaspreet, S. and Niraj, S., Effect of internal customer satisfaction index on revamping of iso implementation structure in a r&d organization, in Decision analytics applications in industry. 2020, Springer.13-20.
  19. Soltanzadeh, J., Elyasi, M., Ghaderifar, E., Soufi, H.R. and Khoshsirat, M., "Evaluation of the effect of r&d subsidies on iranian firms’ innovative behavior: Reconceptualizing behavioral additionality", Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, (2019). doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-11-2018-0109.
  20. Liu, H.-h., Yang, G.-l., Liu, X.-x. and Song, Y.-y., "R&d performance assessment of industrial enterprises in china: A two-stage dea approach", Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 71, (2020), 100753. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2019.100753.
  21. Sinimole, K. and Saini, K.M., "Performance evaluation of r&d organisations: An asian perspective", International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol. 28, No. 2, (2021), 179-196, doi: 10.1080/13571516.2020.1858703.
  22. Chachuli, F.S.M., Mat, S., Ludin, N.A. and Sopian, K., "Performance evaluation of renewable energy r&d activities in malaysia", Renewable Energy, Vol. 163, (2021), 544-560. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.160.
  23. Koçak, E., Kınacı, H. and Shehzad, K., "Environmental efficiency of disaggregated energy r&d expenditures in oecd: A bootstrap dea approach", Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 28, No. 15, (2021), 19381-19390. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12132-w.
  24. Mete, M.H. and Belgin, O., "Impact of knowledge management performance on the efficiency of r&d active firms: Evidence from turkey", Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 13, No. 2, (2022), 830-848. doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00758-1.
  25. Dai, H., Jiang, B., Hu, X., Lin, X., Wei, X. and Pecht, M., "Advanced battery management strategies for a sustainable energy future: Multilayer design concepts and research trends", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 138, (2021), 110480, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110480.
  26. Velásquez, G., Rethinking r&d for pharmaceutical products after the novel coronavirus covid-19 shock, in Vaccines, medicines and covid-19. 2022, Springer.59-72.
  27. Amarasekara, C., Iyke, B.N. and Narayan, P.K., "The role of r&d and economic policy uncertainty in sri lanka’s economic growth", Financial Innovation, Vol. 8, No. 1, (2022), 1-19. doi: 10.1186/s40854-021-00322-5.
  28. Belderbos, R., Lokshin, B., Boone, C. and Jacob, J., "Top management team international diversity and the performance of international r&d", Global Strategy Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, (2022), 108-133. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1395.
  29. Karamaşa, Ç., "Ranking service quality using multi-criteria decision-making methods: Example of erzurum province", Journal of Process Management and New Technologies, Vol. 9, No. 3-4, (2021), 1-12. doi: 10.5937/jpmnt9-33449.
  30. Baç, U., "An integrated swara-waspas group decision making framework to evaluate smart card systems for public transportation", Mathematics, Vol. 8, No. 10, (2020), 1723. doi: 10.3390/math8101723.
  31. Khalili, J. and Alinezhad, A., "Performance evaluation in aggregate production planning using integrated red-swara method under uncertain condition", Scientia Iranica, Vol. 28, No. 2, (2021), 912-926, doi: 10.24200/sci.2020.50202.1584.
  32. Fenton, N. and Wang, W., "Risk and confidence analysis for fuzzy multicriteria decision making", Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 19, No. 6, (2006), 430-437. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2006.03.002.
  33. Vincent, F.Y. and Hu, K.-J., "An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria approach for the performance evaluation of multiple manufacturing plants", Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 58, No. 2, (2010), 269-277. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2009.10.005.
  34. Liao, M.-S., Liang, G.-S. and Chen, C.-Y., "Fuzzy grey relation method for multiple criteria decision-making problems", Quality & Quantity, Vol. 47, No. 6, (2013), 3065-3077. doi: 10.1007/s11135-012-9704-5.
  35. Zhao, H. and Guo, S., "Selecting green supplier of thermal power equipment by using a hybrid mcdm method for sustainability", Sustainability, Vol. 6, No. 1, (2014), 217-235. doi: 10.3390/su6010217.
  36. Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E.K. and Turskis, Z., "Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA)", Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, (2010), 243-258. doi: 10.3846/jbem.2010.12.
  37. Mavi, R.K., Goh, M. and Zarbakhshnia, N., "Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy swara and fuzzy moora in plastic industry", The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 91, No. 5, (2017), 2401-2418. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9880-x.
  38. Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Raslanas, S., Ginevicius, R., Komka, A. and Malinauskas, P., "Selection of low-e windows in retrofit of public buildings by applying multiple criteria method copras: A lithuanian case", Energy and Buildings, Vol. 38, No. 5, (2006), 454-462. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.08.005.
  39. Zarbakhshnia, N., Soleimani, H. and Ghaderi, H., "Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy swara and developed fuzzy copras in the presence of risk criteria", Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 65, (2018), 307-319. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.023.
  40. Collette, Y. and Siarry, P., "Multiobjective optimization: Principles and case studies, Springer Science & Business Media, (2004).
  41. Babbar, C. and Amin, S.H., "A multi-objective mathematical model integrating environmental concerns for supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy qfd in beverages industry", Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 92, (2018), 27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.041.