Implementation of Total Productive Maintenance to Improve Overall Equipment Effectiveness of Linear Accelerator Synergy Platform Cancer Therapy

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Industrial Engineering Depertment, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

The Jakarta Government Hospital provides cancer services with several available types of equipment, one of which is the Linear accelerator (LINAC) Synergy Platform (SP) machine. The phenomenon of this machine experiencing a low effectiveness value because it is not able to handle the patient queue so it is not able to reduce the severity of cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors causing the low value of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) and provide suggestions for improvement to increase the OEE value. The new approach of this research is using the Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) approach with OEE analysis as a success parameter because TPM is more identical in the manufacturing industry. Another update is using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) through Focus Group Discussions (FGD) with experts. The results of the study found that the factors that influenced the low OEE value on the LINAC SP machine were caused by breakdown loss of 76.29%, setup loss of 9.59%, idling and minor stop of 8.80%, and a decrease in speed of 5.29%. The continuous and consistent implementation of the TPM Pillar has increased the OEE value of the LINAC SP machine.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Bahreini, L. Doshmangir, and A. Imani, “Influential factors on medical equipment maintenance management: In search of a framework,” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 1, (2019), 128-143, doi: 10.1108/JQME-11-2017-0082.
  2. Mohammadian, M. Babaei, M. A. Jarrahi, and E. Anjomrouz, “Scheduling nurse shifts using goal programming based on nurse preferences: A case study in an emergency department,” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics, Vol. 32, No. 7, (2019), 954-963, doi: 10.5829/ije.2019.32.07a.08.
  3. Setiawan, “Integration of Total Productive Maintenance and Industry 4.0 to increase the productivity of NC Bore machines in the Musical Instrument Industry,” in Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Singapore, 4701-4711, (2021).
  4. A. Prabowo, Y. B. Suprapto, and F. Farida, “The Evaluation of Eight Pillars Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) Implementation and Their Impact on Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) and Waste,” Sinergi, Vol. 22, No. 1, (2018), 13-18, doi: 10.22441/sinergi.2018.1.003.
  5. D. Morales Méndez and R. S. Rodriguez, “Total productive maintenance (TPM) as a tool for improving productivity: a case study of application in the bottleneck of an auto-parts machining line,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 92, No. 1-4, (2017), 1013-1026, doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0052-4.
  6. Rozak, C. Jaqin, and H. Hasbullah, “Increasing overall equipment effectiveness in automotive company using DMAIC and FMEA method,” Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, Vol. 53, No. 1, (2020), 55-60, doi: 10.18280/jesa.530107.
  7. Setiawan, “Literature Review of the Implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) in various Industries in Indonesia,” Indonesian Journal of Industrial Engineering Management, Vol. 2, No. 1, (2021), 16-34, doi: doi.org/10.22441/ijiem.v2i1.10328.
  8. Nakhla, “Designing extended overall equipment effectiveness: application in healthcare operations,” International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, (2018), 227-236, doi: 10.1080/17509653.2017.1373377.
  9. Suryaprakash, M. Gomathi Prabha, M. Yuvaraja, and R. V. Rishi Revanth, “Improvement of overall equipment effectiveness of machining centre using tpm,” Materials Today Proceedings, (2020), doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.820.
  10. Abbasghorbani, Prioritization of Transmission Network Components Based on their Failure Impact on the Reliability of Composite Power Systems, International Journal of Engineering, Transactions C: Aspects Vol. 35, No. 03, (2022) 502-509. doi: 10.5829/ije.2022.35.03c.02
  11. A. Mkalaf, “Total Productive Maintenance: A Safety Approach to Optimize the Anesthesia Device Outcomes,” ICITM-9th International Conference on Industrial Technology Management, (2020), 122-126, doi: 10.1109/ICITM48982.2020.9080374.
  12. Sharma, J. Singh, and V. Rastogi, “The impact of total productive maintenance on key performance indicators (PQCDSM): A case study of automobile manufacturing sector,” International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, (2018), 267-283, doi: 10.1504/IJPQM.2018.091794.
  13. Tian Xiang and C. Jeng Feng, “Implementing Total Productive Maintenance in a Manufacturing Small or Medium-Sized Enterprise,” Journal of Industrial Engineering Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, (2020), 152-175, doi: https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3286.
  14. Pacaiova and G. Izarikova, “Base principles and practices for implementation of total productive maintenance in automotive industry,” Quality Innovation Prosperity, Vol. 23, No. 1, (2019), 45-59, doi: 10.12776/QIP.V23I1.1203.
  15. Thorat and G. T. Mahesha, “Improvement in productivity through TPM Implementation,” Materials Today Proceedings, Vol. 24, (2020), 1508-1517, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.470.
  16. Fasihi, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, S. E. Najafi, and M. Hahiaghaei-Keshteli, “Developing a Bi-objective mathematical model to design the fish closed-loop supply chain,” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, Vol. 34, No. 5, (2021), 1257-1268, doi: 10.5829/ije.2021.34.05b.19.
  17. Jaqin, A. Rozak, and H. H. Purba, “Case Study in Increasing Overall Equipment Effectiveness on Progressive Press Machine Using Plan-do-check-act Cycle,” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, Vol. 33, No. 11, (2020), 2245-2251, doi: 10.5829/ije.2020.33.11b.16.
  18. Ahmed Ali Omer, “Instrumental Quality Control of Therapeutic Linear Accelerator Performance,” American Journal of Physics and Applications, Vol. 5, No. 5, (2017), 66-78, doi: 10.11648/j.ajpa.20170505.12.
  19. Francis, D. Suresh, S. Nath, S. Lakshmi, B. Jayaraj, N. Puzhakkal, and P. Pournami, “Monte Carlo Simulation of Linear Accelerator for Dosimetry Analysis,” 6th International Conference for Convergence in Technology, I2CT, (2021), doi: 10.1109/I2CT51068.2021.9418059.
  20. J. Choi, H. Park, C. Y. Yi, B. C. Kim, W. G. Shin, and C. H. Min, “Determining the energy spectrum of clinical linear accelerator using an optimized photon beam transmission protocol,” Medical Physics, Vol. 46, No. 7, (2019), 3285-3297, doi: 10.1002/MP.13569.
  21. B. Patil and M. K. Zope, “A Dosimetric Characterization of an Elekta Synergy Platform Linear Accelerator,” IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 5, (2019), 40-46, doi: 10.9790/0853-1805114046.
  22. Samir, M. Zerfaoui, A. Moussa, Y. Benkhouya, and M. El Ouartiti, “Grid Monte Carlo Simulation of a Medical Linear Accelerator,” European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, Vol. 3, No. 12, (2018), 40-43, doi: 10.24018/ejers.2018.3.12.1001.
  23. Nakajima, Introduction to Total Productive Maintenance. Cambridge: Productivity Press, Inc, 1988.
  24. Y. Ali, “Application of Total Productive Maintenance in Service Organization,” International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, (2019), 176-186, doi: 10.22105/riej.2019.170507.1076.
  25. M. Fathollahi-Fard, L. Woodward, and O. Akhrif, “Sustainable distributed permutation flow-shop scheduling model based on a triple bottom line concept,” Journal of Industrial Information Integration, Vol. 24, No. 12, (2021), doi: 10.1016/J.JII.2021.100233.
  26. Yuan, Y. Yang, G. Tian, and A. M. Fathollahi-Fard, “Capacitated multi-objective disassembly scheduling with fuzzy processing time via a fruit fly optimization algorithm,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, (2022), https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1075510/v1
  27. Gholizadeh, A. M. Fathollahi-Fard, H. Fazlollahtabar, and V. Charles, “Fuzzy data-driven scenario-based robust data envelopment analysis for prediction and optimisation of an electrical discharge machine’s parameters,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 193, No. 1, (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116419.
  28. P. Herry, F. Farida, and N. I. Lutfia, “Performance analysis of TPM implementation through Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) and Six Big Losses,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science Engineering, Vol. 453, No. 1, (2018), doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/453/1/012061.
  29. Sunadi, H. H. Purba, and E. Paulina, “Overall Equipment Effectiveness to Increase Productivity of Injection Molding Machine : A Case Study in Plastic Manufacturing Industry,” ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, Vol. 12, No. 1, (2021), 53-64, 2021, doi: 10.21512/comtech.v12i1.6706.
  30. H. Stamatis, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis FMEA from Theory to Execution. Wisconsin: ASQC Quality Press, 1995.
  31. A. Bennett, R. McDermott, and M. Beauregard, The Basics of FMEA, 2017. Productivity Press https://doi.org/10.1201/b16656
  32. Ardeshir, P. F. Ahmadi, and H. Bayat, “A Prioritization Model for HSE Risk Assessment Using Combined Failure Mode and Effect Analysis and Fuzzy Inference System: A Case Study in Iranian Construction Industry,” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions C: Aspects, Vol. 31, No. 9, (2018), 1487-1497, doi: 10.5829/ije.2018.31.09c.03.
  33. Kurnia, C. Jaqin, H. H. Purba, and I. Setiawan, “Implementation of Six Sigma in the DMAIC Approach for Quality Improvement in the Knitting Socks Industry,” Tekstilvemuhendis, Vol. 28, No. 124, (2021), 269-278, doi: 10.7216/1300759920212812403.
  34. Kurnia, C. Jaqin, and H. Manurung, “Implemantation of the DMAIC Approach for Quality Improvement at the Elastic Tape Industry,” J@ti Undip Jurnal Teknik Industri, Vol. 17, No. 1, (2022), 40-51, doi: 10.14710/jati.17.1.40-51.
  35. Niñerola, M. V. Sánchez-Rebull, and A. B. Hernández-Lara, “Quality improvement in healthcare: Six Sigma systematic review,” Health Policy (New York)., Vol. 124, No. 4, (2020), 438-445, doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.01.002.
  36. Gholizadeh, H. Fazlollahtabar, A. M. Fathollahi-Fard, and M. A. Dulebenets, “Preventive maintenance for the flexible flowshop scheduling under uncertainty: a waste-to-energy system,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 1, No. 9, (2021), doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16234-x.
  37. Sutoni, W. Setyawan, and T. Munandar, “Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) Analysis on Lathe Machines using the Overall Equipment Effectiveness Method and Six Big Losses,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1179, No. 1, (2019), 1-7, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012089.
  38. T. Bekar, A. Skoogh, and N. Cetin, “Prediction of Industry 4.0’s Impact on Total Productive Maintenance Using a Real Manufacturing Case,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2018, (2019), 136-149, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92267-6.
  39. B. Patil, A. S. Badiger, and A. H. Mishrikoti, “A Study on Productivity Improvement through Application of Total Productive Maintenance in Indian Industries-A Literature Review,” IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 3, (2018), 13-23, doi: 10.9790/1684-1503041323.
  40. A. Dulebenets, “A Delayed Start Parallel Evolutionary Algorithm for just-in-time truck scheduling at a cross-docking facility,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 212, No. 6, (2019), 236-258, doi: 10.1016/J.IJPE.2019.02.017.
  41. A. Dulebenets, J. Pasha, O. F. Abioye, M. Kavoosi, E. E.Ozguven, R. Moses, W. R. Boot, and T. Sando, “Exact and heuristic solution algorithms for efficient emergency evacuation in areas with vulnerable populations,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 39, No. 10, (2019), 101-114, doi: 10.1016/J.IJDRR.2019.101114.
  42. M. Fathollahi-Fard, M. A. Dulebenets, M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, M. Safaeian, and H. Mirzahosseinian, “Two hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms for a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain network design problem in the tire industry under uncertainty,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 50, No. 10, (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2021.101418.
  43. Didi, K. Bahhous, M. Zerfaoui, Z. Aboulbanine, H. Ouhadda, and A. Halimi, “Experimental validation of a linac head Geant4 model under a grid computing environment,” Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express, Vol. 8, No. 2, (2022), 25-37, doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/AC4DD2.