1. Rejšek, K., Buchar, J., Vaníček, I., Hromádko, L., Vranová, V., and Marosz, K., “Results of dynamic penetration test-an indicator of the compaction of surface soil horizons by forestry machinery”,
Journal of Forest Science, Vol. 57, No. 10, (2011), 439–450.
https://doi.org/10.17221/4/2011-JFS
2. DIN 4094, “Dynamic and standard penetrometers, Part 1: Dimensions of apparatus and method of operation; Part 2: Application and evaluation”, Deutsches Institut fur Normung, Berlin, (1980).
3. BS 1377, “British standard methods of test for soils; Part 9: In- situ tests”, British Standards Institution, UK, (1990).
4. ASTM D6951 / D695 1M – 09, “Standard test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications”, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, USA, (2015).
5. ISO 22476-2: 2005+A1, “Geotechnical investigation and testing -Field testing -Part 2: Dynamic probing”, International Standardization Organization, (2011).
6. INSO 12305-2, “Geotechnical investigation and testing -Field testing -Part 2: Dynamic probing”, Iranian National Standardization Organization, Iran (In Persian), (2014).
View the download link
7. Ceccato, F., Beuth, L., Vermeer, P. A., and Simonini, P., “Two-phase Material Point Method applied to the study of cone penetration”,
Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 80, (2016), 440–452.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.03.003
8. Ciantia, M. O., Arroyo, M., Butlanska, J., and Gens, A., “DEM modelling of cone penetration tests in a double-porosity crushable granular material”,
Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 73, (2016), 109–127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.12.001
10. Suzuki, Y. and Lehane, B. M., “Analysis of CPT end resistance at variable penetration rates using the spherical cavity expansion method in normally consolidated soils”,
Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 69, (2015), 141–152.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.04.019
11. Kouretzis, G. P., Sheng, D., and Wang, D., “Numerical simulation of cone penetration testing using a new critical state constitutive model for sand”,
Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 56, (2014), 50–60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.11.002
12. Lin, C., Tu, F., Ling, D., and Hu C
., “FEM-DEM coupled modeling of cone penetration tests in lunar soil”,
Journal of Central South University, Vol. 25, No. 2, (2018), 392–405.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-018-3745-4
14. Khodaparast, M., Rajabi, A. M., and Mohammadi, M., “The new empirical formula based on dynamic probing test results in fine cohesive soils”,
International Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 2B, (2015), 105–113.
http://dx.doi.org/10.22068/IJCE.13.2.105
15. Lee, C., Kim, K. S., Woo, W., and Lee, W., “Soil Stiffness Gauge (SSG) and Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests for estimating engineering properties of weathered sandy soils in Korea”,
Journal of Engineering Geology, Vol. 169, (2014), 91–99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.11.010
16. Fakher, A., Khodaparast, M., and Jones, C. J. F. P., “The use of the Mackintosh Probe for site investigation in soft soils”,
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, Vol. 39, No. 2, (2006), 189–196.
https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236-05-039
17. Gholami, A., Palassi, M., and Fakher, A., “Assessment of the Effect of Skin Friction on the Results of Dynamic Penetration Testing in Cohesionless Soil”,
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering, Vol. 44, No. 2, (2020), 715–721.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00286-8
18. Rollins, K. M., Amoroso, S., Milana, G., Minarelli, L., Vassallo, M., and Di Giulio, G., “Gravel Liquefaction Assessment Using the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test Based on Field Performance from the 1976 Friuli Earthquake”,
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 146, No. 6, (2020), 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002252
19. Butcher, A. P., Mcelmeel, K., Powel, J. J. M., “Dynamic probing and its use in clay soils”, In: Advances in site investigation practice, Thomas Telford Publishing. (1995), 383-395.
20. Mesri, G. and Hayat, T. M., “The coefficient of earth pressure at rest”,
Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 30, No. 4, (1993), 647–666.
https://doi.org/10.1139/t93-056
21. Abaqus, Ver. 6.11, Providence, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp, RI, USA, (2011).
22. Drucker, D.C. and Prager, W., Soil mechanics and plastic analysis for limit design”,
Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 10, (1952), 157-165.
https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/48291
23. Chen, W. and Saleeb, A., “Constitutive equations for engineering materials, Vol. 1: Elasticity and modeling”. John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1982).
24. Budhu, M., Soil mechanics and foundations., John Wiley & Sons, New York, (2010).