Integrated Competitive Pricing and Transshipment Problem for Short Life Cycle Products’ Supply Chain

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This paper integrates competitive pricing and network design problems for the short life cycle products. The pricing problem determines selling prices of the products for different life cycle phases in a competitive market, as well as acquisition management of returned products. Besides, the selling and acquisition prices are related to the distance between distribution centers and customers. The network design problem aims to determine network flow and fleet assignment in each route. The proposed model is solved by various methods including exact and meta-heuristic approaches. The model and solving approaches have been validated and verified by several simulated examples and sensitivity analyses. Considering life cycle phases, competitive pricing, and transshipment problems as an integrated model, provides a new approach for the optimum solutions, which makes it more practical for application of real cases of short life cycle products. The results showed how the competition and fleet assignment influenced the optimum solution.

Keywords


 
1. Moniri, A., Yousefi Yegane, B., and Farsi, E., “Simultaneous
Pricing, Routing, and Inventory Control for Perishable Goods in
a Two-echelon Supply Chain,” International Journal of
Engineering, Transactions A: Basics, Vol. 31, No. 7, (2018),
1074–1081. 
2. Honarvar, M. and Ahmadi Yazdi, A., “A Two Stage Stochastic
Programming Model of the Price Decision Problem in the Dualchannel
Closed-loop
Supply
Chain,”
International Journal of 
Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, Vol. 28, No. 5,
(2015), 738–745. 
3. Ghomi-Avili, M., Naeini, S.G.J., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.
and Jabbarzadeh, A., “A fuzzy pricing model for a green
competitive closed-loop supply chain network design in the
presence of disruptions,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.
188, (2018), 425–442.  
4. Nobari, A. and Kheirkhah, A., “Integrated and Dynamic Design
of Sustainable Closed-loop Supply Chain Network Considering
Pricing,” Scientia Iranica, Vol. 25, No. 1, (2018), 410–430. 
5. Saghaeeian, A. and Ramezanian, R., “An efficient hybrid
genetic algorithm for multi-product competitive supply chain
network design with price-dependent demand,” Applied Soft
Computing, Vol. 71, (2018), 872–893. 
6. Taleizadeh, A. A., Haghighi, F. and Niaki, S. T. A., “Modeling
and solving a sustainable closed loop supply chain problem with
pricing decisions and discounts on returned products,” Journal
of Cleaner Production, Vol. 207, (2019), 163–181.  
7. Zhang, W. and He, Y., “Optimal policies for new and green
remanufactured short-life-cycle products considering consumer
behavior,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 214, (2019),
483–505.  
8. Zheng, X.X., Liu, Z., Li, K.W., Huang, J. and Chen, J.,
“Cooperative game approaches to coordinating a three-echelon
closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns,” International
Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 212, (2019), 92–110.  
9. Choi, T.M., “Pricing and branding for remanufactured fashion
products,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 165, (2017),
1385–1394.  
10. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., Mohammadzadeha, H. and Fathollahi
Fard, A. M., “New Approaches in Metaheuristics to Solve the
Truck Scheduling Problem in a Cross-docking Center,” 
International Journal of Engineering - Transactions B:
Applications, Vol. 31, No. 8, (2018), 1258–1266. 
11. Mirjalili, S. and Lewis, A., “The Whale Optimization
Algorithm,” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 95,
(2016), 51–67. 
12. Guo, J., He, L. and Gen, M., “Optimal strategies for the closedloop supply chain with the consideration of supply disruption
and subsidy policy,” Computers & Industrial Engineering,
Vol. 128, (2019), 886–893.