A New Approach to Project Risk Responses Selection with Inter-dependent Risks

Authors

1 Training and Human Resourse Development Department, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Fouman, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Fouman, Iran

Abstract

Risks are natural and inherent characteristics of major projects. Risks are usually considered independently in analysis of risk responses. However, most risks are dependent on each other and dependent risks are rare in the real world. This paper proposes a model for proper risk response selection from the responses portfolio with the purpose of optimization of defined criteria for projects. This research has taken into account the relationships between risk responses; especially the relationships between risks, which have been rarely considered in previous works. It must be pointed out that not considering or superficial evaluation of the interactions between risks and risk responses reduces the expected desirability and increases project execution costs. This model is capable of optimization of different criteria in the objective function based on the proposed projects. Multi-objective Harmony Search (MOHS) is used to solve this model and the numerical results obtained are analyzed.

Keywords


1.     Radovanovic, L.j., Adamovic, Z. and Speight, J., "Risk analysis for increasing safety in power plants", Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy,  Vol. 10, No. 3, (2015), 263-270.

2.     Buchan, D.H., "Risk analysis--some practical suggestions", Cost Engineering,  Vol. 36, No. 1, (1994), 29-36.

3.     Miller, R. and Lessard, D., "Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects", International Journal of Project Management,  Vol. 19, No. 8, (2001), 437-443.

4.     Zou, P.X., Zhang, G. and Wang, J., "Understanding the key risks in construction projects in china", International Journal of Project Management,  Vol. 25, No. 6, (2007), 601-614.

5.     Ben-David, I. and Raz, T., "An integrated approach for risk response development in project planning", Journal of the Operational Research Society,  Vol. 52, No. 1, (2001), 14-25.

6.     Mousavi, S., Makoui, A., Raissi, S. and Mojtahedi, S., "A multi-criteria decision-making approach with interval numbers for evaluating project risk responses", International Journal of Engineering-Transactions B: Applications,  Vol. 25, No. 2, (2012), 121-129.

7.     Fan, M., Lin, N.-P. and Sheu, C., "Choosing a project risk-handling strategy: An analytical model", International Journal of Production Economics,  Vol. 112, No. 2, (2008), 700-713.

8.     Ren, H., "Risk lifecycle and risk relationships on construction projects", International Journal of Project Management,  Vol. 12, No. 2, (1994), 68-74.

9.     Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Williams, T. and Howick, S., "Systemic risk assessment: A case study", Journal of the Operational Research Society,  Vol. 58, No. 1, (2007), 39-51.

10.   Adner, R., "Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem", Harvard Business Review,  Vol. 84, No. 4, (2006), 98-104.

11.   Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M., Anac, C., Tah, J. and Aouad, G., "Learning from risks: A tool for post-project risk assessment", Automation in Construction,  Vol. 18, No. 1, (2008), 42-50.

12.   Zoullouti, B., Amghar, M. and Sbiti, N., "Risk analysis of operating room using the fuzzy bayesian network model", International Journal of Engineering-Transactions B: Applications,  Vol. 30, No. 1, (2017), 66-74.

13.   Kwan, T.W. and Leung, H.K., "A risk management methodology for project risk dependencies", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,  Vol. 37, No. 5, (2011), 635-648.

14.   Pajares, J. and López, A., "New methodological approaches to project portfolio management: The role of interactions within projects and portfolios", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,  Vol. 119, (2014), 645-652.

15.   Zhang, Y. and Fan, Z.-P., "An optimization method for selecting project risk response strategies", International Journal of Project Management,  Vol. 32, No. 3, (2014), 412-422.

16.   Datta, S. and Mukherjee, S., "Developing a risk management matrix for effective project planning--an empirical study, Project Management Institute., (2001).

17.   Kujawski, E., "Selection of technical risk responses for efficient contingencies", Systems Engineering,  Vol. 5, No. 3, (2002), 194-212.

18.   Pipattanapiwong, J. and Watanabe, T., "Multi-party risk management process (MRMP) for a construction project financed by an international lender", in Proceeding of Construction Engineering and Management Symposium., (2000), 85-92.

19.   Haimes, Y.Y., Ladson, L. and Wismer, D.A., "Bicriterion formulation of problems of integrated system identification and system optimization", IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics,  Vol., No. 3, (1971), 296-304.

20.   Klein, J.H., "Modelling risk trade-off", Journal of the Operational Research Society,  Vol. 44, No. 5, (1993), 445-460.

21.   Chapman, C.B., "Large engineering project risk analysis", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,  No. 3, (1979), 78-86.

22.   Seyedhoseini, S.M., Noori, S. and Hatefi, M.A., "An integrated methodology for assessment and selection of the project risk response actions", Risk Analysis,  Vol. 29, No. 5, (2009), 752-763.

23.   Ben-David, I., "Economic optimization of project risk management efforts", Tel Aviv University, Israel,  (2002),

24.   Kayis, B., Arndt, G., Zhou, M. and Amornsawadwatana, S., "A risk mitigation methodology for new product and process design in concurrent engineering projects", CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology,  Vol. 56, No. 1, (2007), 167-170.

25.   Zhang, Y., "Selecting risk response strategies considering project risk interdependence", International Journal of Project Management,  Vol. 34, No. 5, (2016), 819-830.

26.   Steward, D., "The design structure matrix: A method for managing the deisgn of complex systems", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,  Vol. 28, No., (1981).

27.   Fang, C. and Marle, F., "A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk management", Decision Support Systems,  Vol. 52, No. 3, (2012), 635-644.

28.   Fang, C., Marle, F., Zio, E. and Bocquet, J.-C., "Network theory-based analysis of risk interactions in large engineering projects", Reliability Engineering & System Safety,  Vol. 106, (2012), 1-10.

29.   Fang, C., Marle, F., Xie, M. and Zio, E., "An integrated framework for risk response planning under resource constraints in large engineering projects", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,  Vol. 60, No. 3, (2013), 627-639.

30.   Saaty, T.L., "The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation, McGraw-Hill International Book Company,  (1980).

31.   Guide, P., "A guide to the project management body of knowledge", in Project Management Institute. Vol. 3, (2004).

32.   Marle, F., Vidal, L.-A. and Bocquet, J.-C., "Interactions-based risk clustering methodologies and algorithms for complex project management", International Journal of Production Economics,  Vol. 142, No. 2, (2013), 225-234.

33.   Soofifard, R. and Khakzar Bafruei, M., "An optimal model for project risk response portfolio selection (p2rps)(case study: Research institute of petroleum industry)", Iranian Journal of Management Studies,  Vol. 9, No. 4, (2017), 741-765.

34.   Soofifard, R. and Bafruei, M.K., "Fuzzy multi-objective model for project risk response selection considering synergism between risk responses", International Journal of Engineering Management and Economics,  Vol. 6, No. 1, (2016), 72-92.

35.   Zegordi, S., Nik, E.R. and Nazari, A., "Power plant project risk assessment using a fuzzy-anp and fuzzy-topsis method", International Journal of Engineering-Transactions B: Applications,  Vol. 25, No. 2, (2012), 107-115.

36.   Eppinger, S.D., Whitney, D.E., Smith, R.P. and Gebala, D.A., "A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development", Research in Engineering Design,  Vol. 6, No. 1, (1994), 1-13.

37.   Geem, Z.W., Kim, J.H. and Loganathan, G., "A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search", Simulation,  Vol. 76, No. 2, (2001), 60-68.