Durability Performance of Self Compacting Concrete Incorporating Alccofine and Fly Ash

Document Type: Original Article


1 Department of Civil Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Anantapur, India

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Tirupati, India


The cost associated with the application of large volume of cement and synthetic admixtures was one of the major drawbacks of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC), which can be reduced by the use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCM). When the demand of cement reduces, the release of carbon dioxide (CO2) from cement industries will come down, which has a positive impact on global warming. The present paper reports an attempt in this direction by experimental examination on the fresh properties and durability performance of SCC by replacing cement with SCM such as fly ash (FA) and ultra-fine Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) in varying ratios. SCC mix was obtained by fixing the water-binder ratio and superplasticizer (SP) dosage with respect to total cementitious content. Along with the Fresh properties, SCC mixes incorporating both alccofine and fly ash at 10 and 25%, respectively; which gave the best fresh properties were selected to assess the durability issues. Incorporating 10% alccofine and 25% fly ash gave the best result in both fresh and durability studies in comparison with other combinations.


1.     Shi, C., Wu, Z., Lv, K., and Wu, L. “A review on mixture design methods for self-compacting concrete.” Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 84, (2015), 387– 398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.079
2.     Ramanathan, P., Baskar, I., Muthupriya, P., and Venkatasubramani, R. “Performance of self-compacting concrete containing different mineral admixtures.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 2, (2013), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1882-8
3.     Owsiak, Z., and Grzmil, W. “The evaluation of the influence of mineral additives on the durability of self-compacting concretes.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 4, (2015), 1002–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0336-7
4.     Le, H. T., and Ludwig, H. M. “Effect of rice husk ash and other mineral admixtures on properties of self-compacting high performance concrete.” Materials and Design, Vol. 89, (2016), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.120
5.     Guru Jawahar, J., Sashidhar, C., Ramana Reddy, I. V., and Annie Peter, J. “Micro and macrolevel properties of fly ash blended self compacting concrete.” Materials and Design, Vol. 46, (2013), 696–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.027
6.     Uysal, M., and Sumer, M. “Performance of self-compacting concrete containing different mineral admixtures.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 25, No. 11, (2011), 4112–4120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.032
7.     El-Chabib, H., and Syed, A. “Properties of Self-Consolidating Concrete Made with High Volumes of Supplementary Cementitious Materials.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 11, (2013), 1579–1586. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000733
8.     Goh, C. S., Gupta, M., Jarfors, A. E. W., Tan, M. J., and Wei, J. “Magnesium and Aluminium carbon nanotube composites.” Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 425, , (2010), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net
9.     Reddy, P. N., and Naqash, J. A. “Development of high early strength in concrete incorporating alccofine and non-chloride accelerator.” SN Applied Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 7, (2019), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0790-z
10.   Reddy, P. N., and Naqash, J. A. “Effect of Alccofine on Strength and Durability Index Properties of Green Concrete.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions C: Aspects, Vol. 32, No. 6, (2019), 813–819. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2019.32.06c.03
11.   Reddy, P. N., and Naqash, J. A. “Experimental study on TGA, XRD and SEM Analysis of Concrete with Ultra-fine Slag.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, Vol. 32, No. 5, (2019), 679–684. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2019.32.05b.09
12.   Reddy, P. N., and Naqash, J. A. “Properties of concrete modified with ultra-fine slag.” Karbala International Journal of Modern Science, Vol. 5, No. 3, (2019), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.33640/2405-609X.1141
13.   Reddy, P. N., and Naqash, J. A. “Effectiveness of polycarboxylate ether on early strength development of alccofine concrete.” Pollack Periodica, Vol. 15, No. 1, (2020), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2020.15.1.8
14.   BIS 12269, Ordinary Portland cement 53 Grade-Specification, New Delhi, India, (2013).
15.   BIS 383, Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete, New Delhi, India, (2016).,
16.   ASTM C494, Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete, Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, (2004).
17.   ASTM C989, Standard Specification for Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag for Use in Concrete and Mortars, West Conshohocken, USA, (1999).
18.   BIS 10262, Concrete Mix Proportioning—Guideline. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, (2009).
19.   EFNARC, The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete (EFNARC), Specification, production and use, (2005).
20.   Azarsa, P., and Gupta, R. “Electrical Resistivity of Concrete for Durability Evaluation: A Review.” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 2017, (2017), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8453095
21.           T. Subbulakshmi, and Dr. B. Vidivelli. “Rapid Chloride Permeability Test on HPC Incorporating Industrial Byproducts.” Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, (2016), 247–431. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2016.24.02.22935