IJE TRANSACTIONS C: Aspects Vol. 30, No. 9 (September 2017) 1298-1308   

PDF URL: http://www.ije.ir/Vol30/No9/C/2-2565.pdf  
downloaded Downloaded: 107   viewed Viewed: 741

M. Hoseinzadeh and S. Pourzeynali
( Received: January 20, 2017 – Accepted in Revised Form: July 07, 2017 )

Abstract    The present aim of this study is to investigate the effect of different parameters influencing pounding in highway bridges. Pounding is the result of a collision between two parts of the deck and/or the deck and abutments at the separation distance during the earthquake. In the present study, the period ratio of the adjacent frames, ground motion spatial variation, and soil-structure interaction were considered as the significant parameters influencing the pounding. Accordingly, 144 different models of bridge were generated by changing characteristics of the piers and spans length, and were subjected to non-linear dynamic analysis. The results indicated that ignoring the effects of soil-structure interaction and ground motion spatial variation led to calculate unrealistic responses in the bridges. Finally, it is found that designing bridges including frames with similar or close period is not regarded as an appropriate solution to reduce the pounding effects in the bridges.


Keywords    Bridge, Pounding, Ground motion spatial variation, Soil-structure interaction


چکیده    این مطالعه به بررسی اثر پارامترهای موثر بر ایجاد ضربه در پل‌ها می‌پردازد. پدیده ضربه در اثر برخورد بین دو بخش از عرشه، یا عرشه و پایه‌های کناری پل در محل درزهای انقطاع به علت پاسخ‌های غیر هم‌فاز در هنگام زلزله رخ می‌دهد. پارامترهای مورد برسی شامل: نسبت دوره تناوب قاب‌های مجاورهم، حرکات ناهمگون زمین و اندرکنش خاک-سازه می‌باشند. بدین منظور 144 نمونه مختلف از پل با تغییر در مشخصات پایه‌ها و اندازه دهانه‌ها ایجاد گردیده و تحت تحلیل‌های دینامیکی غیرخطی قرار می‌گیرند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که عدم ملاحظه اثر اندرکنش خاک-سازه و حرکات ناهمگون زمین موجب محاسبه پاسخ‌های غیرواقعی در پل‌ها می‌گردد. همچنین، به علت پاسخ‌های غیر هم‌فاز ایجاد شده در اثر حرکات ناهمگون زمین و اندرکنش خاک-سازه، طراحی پل‌ها با قاب‌های دارای دوره تناوب مشابه یا نزدیک به هم، راهکار مناسبی برای کاهش خسارات ناشی از پدیده ضربه نمی‌باشد.


1.      Hao, H., "A parametric study of the required seating length for bridge decks during earthquake", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,  Vol. 27, No. 1, (1998), 91-103.

2.      Chouw, N. and Hao, H., "Significance of ssi and nonuniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response i: Effect on response with conventional expansion joint", Engineering Structures,  Vol. 30, No. 1, (2008), 141-153.

3.      Cui, L., Guo, A. and Li, H., "Investigation of the parameters of hertz impact model for the pounding analysis of highway bridge", Procedia Engineering,  Vol. 14, No., (2011), 2773-2778.

4.      Association, J.R., "Specifications for highway bridges", Part V Seismic Design,  (2002), 28.

5.      Caltrans, S., "Caltrans seismic design criteria version 1.6", California Department of Transportation, Sacramento,  (2010).

6.      Zerva, A. and Zervas, V., "Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: An overview", Applied Mechanics Reviews,  Vol. 55, No. 3, (2002), 271-297.

7.      Hao, H., Oliveira, C. and Penzien, J., "Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on smart-1 array data", Nuclear Engineering and Design,  Vol. 111, No. 3, (1989), 293-310.

8.      Bi, K., Hao, H. and Chouw, N., "Influence of ground motion spatial variation, site condition and ssi on the required separation distances of bridge structures to avoid seismic pounding", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,  Vol. 40, No. 9, (2011), 1027-1043.

9.      Makris, N., Badoni, D., Delis, E. and Gazetas, G., "Prediction of observed bridge response with soil-pile-structure interaction", Journal of Structural Engineering,  Vol. 120, No. 10, (1994), 2992-3011.

10.    Spyrakos, C. and Vlassis, A., "Effect of soil-structure interaction on seismically isolated bridges", Journal of Earthquake Engineering,  Vol. 6, No. 03, (2002), 391-429.

11.    Hosseinzadeh, M. and Pourzeinali, S., "Evaluation of pounding effect on seismic response of bridges under soil-structure interaction",  (2016).

12.    Ruangrassamee, A. and Kawashima, K., "Relative displacement response spectra with pounding effect", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,  Vol. 30, No. 10, (2001), 1511-1538.

13.    DesRoches, R. and Muthukumar, S., "Effect of pounding and restrainers on seismic response of multiple-frame bridges", Journal of Structural Engineering,  Vol. 128, No. 7, (2002), 860-869.

14.    Chouw, N. and Hao, H., "Significance of ssi and non-uniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response ii: Effect on response with modular expansion joint", Engineering Structures,  Vol. 30, No. 1, (2008), 154-162.

15.    Bi, K., Hao, H. and Chouw, N., "Required separation distance between decks and at abutments of a bridge crossing a canyon site to avoid seismic pounding", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,  Vol. 39, No. 3, (2010), 303-323.

16.    Bi, K. and Hao, H., "Numerical simulation of pounding damage to bridge structures under spatially varying ground motions", Engineering Structures,  Vol. 46, (2013), 62-76.

17.    Zheng, Y., Xiao, X., Zhi, L. and Wang, G., "Evaluation on impact interaction between abutment and steel girder subjected to nonuniform seismic excitation", Shock and Vibration,  Vol. 2015, (2015).

18.    Pourzeynali, S. and Esteki, S., "Optimization of the tmd parameters to suppress the vertical vibrations of suspension bridges subjected to earthquake excitations", Iranian International Journal of Engineering, IJE Transaction B (Application),  Vol. 22, No. 1, (2009), 23-34.

19.    Pourzeynali, S., Malekzadeh, M. and Esmaeilian, F., "Multi-objective optimization of semi-active control of seismically exited buildings using variable damper and genetic algorithms", International Journal of Engineering,  Vol. 25, No. 3, (2012), 265-276.

20.    Jankowski, R., Wilde, K. and Fujino, Y., "Reduction of pounding effects in elevated bridges during earthquakes", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,  Vol. 29, No. 2, (2000), 195-212.

21.    Jankowski, R., "Non‐linear viscoelastic modelling of earthquake‐induced structural pounding", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,  Vol. 34, No. 6, (2005), 595-611.

22.    Jankowski, R., "Analytical expression between the impact damping ratio and the coefficient of restitution in the non‐linear viscoelastic model of structural pounding", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,  Vol. 35, No. 4, (2006), 517-524.

23.    Jankowski, R., "Experimental study on earthquake‐induced pounding between structural elements made of different building materials", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,  Vol. 39, No. 3, (2010), 343-354.

24.    Ruangrassamee, A. and Kawashima, K., "Control of nonlinear bridge response with pounding effect by variable dampers", Engineering Structures,  Vol. 25, No. 5, (2003), 593-606.

25.    Guo, A., Zhao, Q. and Li, H., "Experimental study of a highway bridge with shape memory alloy restrainers focusing on the mitigation of unseating and pounding", Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,  Vol. 11, No. 2, (2012), 195-204.

26.    Wolf, J., "Dynamic soil-structure interaction, Prentice Hall, Inc.,  (1985).

27.    Wolf, J.P., "Foundation vibration analysis using simple physical models, Pearson Education,  (1994).

28.    Saatcioglu, M. and Ozcebe, G., "Response of reinforced concrete columns to simulated seismic loading", Structural Journal,  Vol. 86, No. 1, (1989), 3-12.

29.    Saiidi, M. and Sozen, M.A., Simple and complex models for nonlinear seismic response of reinforced concrete structures. (1979), University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station. College of Engineering. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

30.    Council, B.S.S., "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", Report FEMA-356, Washington, DC, (2000).

31.    Code, P., "Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings",  (2005).

32.    Maison, B.F. and Kasai, K., "Analysis for a type of structural pounding", Journal of Structural Engineering,  Vol. 116, No. 4, (1990), 957-977.

33.    Zerva, A., "Spatial variation of seismic ground motion. Modeling and engineering applications" (2009), CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.

34.    Harichandran, R.S. and Vanmarcke, E.H., "Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time", Journal of Engineering Mechanics,  Vol. 112, No. 2, (1986), 154-174.

35.    Clough, R.W. and Penzien, J., "Dynamics of structures, Computers & Structures, Inc,  (2003).

36.             Deodatis, G., "Non-stationary stochastic vector processes: Seismic ground motion applications", Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics,  Vol. 11, No. 3, (1996), 149-167.

Download PDF 

International Journal of Engineering
E-mail: office@ije.ir
Web Site: http://www.ije.ir